Federation Star Ships

Discussion and information relevant to creating special missions, new ships, skins etc.

Moderators: winston, another_commander

User avatar
Sendraks
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:43 pm
Location: Leeds UK

Post by Sendraks »

Jagen Ordo wrote:
Oh, and I'm taking orders.
What ships do you wish to see in Oolite?
Excelsior class was always one of my favourites from classic trek. 8)
User avatar
Jagen Ordo
Competent
Competent
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:22 pm

Post by Jagen Ordo »

Alright, a Klingon Bird of Prey, a Warbird (warning, curvy!), Miranda class, Oberth (again, curvy), the Defiant, a Runabout, and the Excelsior.
I might have to mention that I don't consider any events or ships from the new movie Star Trek. That movie is the kind of stuff that makes me wanna go amok.
Sithspit, I had a Bird of Prey, the Defiant, and an ISD on my old computer.
Meh
Maybe my father has some of my stuff left...
Hello. We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;
we come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, men.
User avatar
ClymAngus
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2514
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:31 am
Location: London England
Contact:

Post by ClymAngus »

Jagen Ordo wrote:
And of course, following Federation Starships will use the same scale.
Oh, and I'm taking orders.
What ships do you wish to see in Oolite?
:shock: That's a dangerous thing to say round these boards, to be honest why not just import any model you want from the 1001 trek interest groups out there?

As for scale, well we have a slight problem there as no one is strictly sure as to the scale of oolite so importing ships might get a little bit tricky.

(I'm starting to come around to the idea of taking a foot and a metre. Splitting the difference and calling it an oolite feeter)

so one foot = 0.3048 meters
1 - 0.3048 = 0.6952 which is the total difference between the two.
0.6952 / 2 = 0.3476 or half the difference, if we add that to the length of one foot we should get a meter value that's splitting the difference between the 2 values.

Ladies and gentlemen for your review I present a mathmatical solution to our scaling issue the oolite feeter:

0.6524 meters or
2.14 feet
or 0.35674 fathoms

or to simplify

0.65 metres
2.13 feet

this would make the cobra III:
(W×H×L) 84.5m x19.5m x42.25m

So you could happily land one on a football pitch with about 5 m to spare either end.

for a more visual comparison, this baby is 85.5 meters in length;

http://www.yachtforums.com/forums/ocean ... 705-a.html

Do we have a workable compromise or what?
Last edited by ClymAngus on Thu Aug 06, 2009 9:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
saint
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: 45.371747 N, 12.011885 E - Sol III
Contact:

Post by saint »

My wife bought the full original series plus the animated one. I thik that she will play oolite when Constitution class is ready!!!!

[ her reply on skype about this news: :)(dance) ]

Live long and prosper Jagen!

// BTW, maybe it's time to do a page on Wiki about a coupe of minor
// spage-oriente religions based on ancient legends.
// It seems that many ship designes follow these religions in ooLite...
Image
Cmdr. Saint, Golden Gladstone with 4 leaves Clovers of the Most Noble Order or The B.D.c.
User avatar
Sendraks
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:43 pm
Location: Leeds UK

Post by Sendraks »

ClymAngus wrote:
As for scale, well we have a slight problem there as no one is strictly sure as to the scale of oolite so importing ships might get a little bit tricky.
I'm confused, I thought the dimensions of all the ships were documented?
User avatar
Cmdr James
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 1357
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Berlin

Post by Cmdr James »

Right, the unit in oolite is metre, but there is some argument that it should be feet.
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Post by DaddyHoggy »

I think the problem is usually one of aesthetics and practicalities (i.e. docking) all the ships from the classics derive their numbers from Holdstock's original Elite Manual based I guess on B&B's own numbers (based in turn on the actual mathematical models of their ships!).

However, because of scaling issues in Oolite - 30km wide planets, 1km wide stations, huge cargo pods so they can be seen etc, the ACTUAL size of an Oolite metre therefore is not only not fixed but has no relationship to a RL metre of the same name.

You make your ship and see how it looks in game, see if it can dock and if it looks too big or too small or it can't dock and you want it too then rescale as appropriate...
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
ClymAngus
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2514
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:31 am
Location: London England
Contact:

Post by ClymAngus »

DaddyHoggy wrote:
I think the problem is usually one of aesthetics and practicalities (i.e. docking) all the ships from the classics derive their numbers from Holdstock's original Elite Manual based I guess on B&B's own numbers (based in turn on the actual mathematical models of their ships!).

However, because of scaling issues in Oolite - 30km wide planets, 1km wide stations, huge cargo pods so they can be seen etc, the ACTUAL size of an Oolite metre therefore is not only not fixed but has no relationship to a RL metre of the same name.

You make your ship and see how it looks in game, see if it can dock and if it looks too big or too small or it can't dock and you want it too then rescale as appropriate...
I know this is raking over old coals but is anyone interested in think tanking this through in order to fix this once and for all?

At the very least it would be an interesting thought experiment, at most we might actually be able to come up with plausible solutions.

I'm thinking of treating it like a design tec project instead of an argument.
User avatar
Cmdr James
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 1357
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Berlin

Post by Cmdr James »

I think actually the reverse -- I think there is some reasonably strong feeling that it should be left as is.
User avatar
Jagen Ordo
Competent
Competent
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:22 pm

Post by Jagen Ordo »

Docking is none of my concerns, that ship is not supposed to dock that way.
Docking computers might be a good investion for this ship. :wink:
My only problem is that everytime I want to jump into hyperspace, the program shuts down.
Suggestions?
Hello. We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;
we come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, men.
User avatar
Lestradae
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 3095
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

...

Post by Lestradae »

Jagen Ordo wrote:
Docking is none of my concerns, that ship is not supposed to dock that way.
It might be interesting for anyone who is interested in flying and properly docking such mega-ships that Frame & meself have a cunning plan to solve that conundrum via Frame creating a transfer shuttle script that will make it look as if the player carrier's Commander is being shuttled back and forth to/from stations and hopefully carriers while the player carrier is waiting in a few kilometres distance for the captain to return.

The nescessary code to accomplish this has already been included into the trunk by some nice devs.

So you can put these concerns to rest, some time during the next weeks this is going to be resolved once and for all :wink:

Cheers

L
User avatar
Jagen Ordo
Competent
Competent
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:22 pm

Post by Jagen Ordo »

Docking is really no concern.
I don't even make it through the system, the game freezes about halfway through it. I use the Oolite 1.72.2, if that helps.
Hello. We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;
we come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, men.
User avatar
Lestradae
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 3095
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

...

Post by Lestradae »

Have a look at the "Logs" folder somewhere in your Oolite folders.

Perhaps you could post the error log from such a crash here? There are people here (not me :oops: ) who might be able to suggest possible causes from there.
User avatar
ClymAngus
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2514
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:31 am
Location: London England
Contact:

Post by ClymAngus »

Cmdr James wrote:
I think actually the reverse -- I think there is some reasonably strong feeling that it should be left as is.
Well, I guess we are going find out; If people are interested PM me and we'll have a frank discussion about it.
User avatar
Jagen Ordo
Competent
Competent
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 4:22 pm

Post by Jagen Ordo »

Error log...
You mean like this?
***** ERROR - attempt to normalise vector ( 0,00000, 0,00000, 0,00000)
Hello. We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;
we come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, men.
Post Reply