Got Constrictor & Thargoid plans rewards mixed upcim wrote:Military lasers ... they can't require the NEU, since you "need" the military laser to fight the Constrictor, and you don't get the NEU until a long time after that mission. Requiring any sort of energy unit would be inconvenient, since you'd be in even more trouble than usual if it got damaged.
Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Moderators: winston, another_commander
- Venator Dha
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:26 am
- Location: Sweden
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Taurus Driving through the galaxy since... .
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
^^ That sparked a thought: make the Constrictor mission give NEU?
Or port another mission from old Elite (or make a completely new one) which would give NEU before Constrictor?
Because I like the mil laser requiring NEU idea.
Or port another mission from old Elite (or make a completely new one) which would give NEU before Constrictor?
Because I like the mil laser requiring NEU idea.
- Cody
- Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
- Posts: 16081
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:31 pm
- Location: The Lizard's Claw
- Contact:
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Quite simply - no!
I would advise stilts for the quagmires, and camels for the snowy hills
And any survivors, their debts I will certainly pay. There's always a way!
And any survivors, their debts I will certainly pay. There's always a way!
- Redspear
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 2687
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:22 pm
- Location: On the moon Thought, orbiting the planet Ignorance.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
And presumably less time-consuming mass-locks...cim wrote:Historical note: as far as balance goes, scanner range in Elite was much reduced compared with ship speed than it is in Oolite. In BBC Elite you can take a stationary target from the edge of scanner to adjacent in 30 seconds - that implies a scanner range of only 9km (weapons ranged at ~5km/10km) in Oolite scale - which would be a very different fighting environment.
I did try a spectrum emulation of elite a while ago; Lave to Zaonce was a very short trip compared to that in Oolite.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Especially since almost every ship you met was hostile - very little of this "slowly crawl past a trader going the same way".Redspear wrote:And presumably less time-consuming mass-locks...
- Redspear
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 2687
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:22 pm
- Location: On the moon Thought, orbiting the planet Ignorance.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
On the plus side, we've got injectors though ...once we can afford 'emcim wrote:Especially since almost every ship you met was hostile - very little of this "slowly crawl past a trader going the same way".Redspear wrote:And presumably less time-consuming mass-locks...
- Redspear
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 2687
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:22 pm
- Location: On the moon Thought, orbiting the planet Ignorance.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Any merit in seperating ship to ship mass-lock from the scanner range?
Maybe to just outside beam laser range? (tries to remember how far that is ...)
Maybe to just outside beam laser range? (tries to remember how far that is ...)
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Why not have the damage inflicted by the laser (of whatever flavour) be range-dependent? So at point-blank range it gives 100% of its damage level, but at maximum range it only gives 50% (for example).
Percentages and damage levels could be tweaked, but it perhaps offers a way to maintain the long range of the mil laser without making it unbalanced to NPCs.
Percentages and damage levels could be tweaked, but it perhaps offers a way to maintain the long range of the mil laser without making it unbalanced to NPCs.
My OXPs via Boxspace or from my Wiki pages .
Thargoid TV
Dropbox Referral Link
Thargoid TV
Dropbox Referral Link
- Norby
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 9:53 pm
- Location: Budapest, Hungary (Mainly Agricultural Democracy, TL10)
- Contact:
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
15km, but I do not want to stop nearer to the bad guys than before.Redspear wrote:Maybe to just outside beam laser range? (tries to remember how far that is ...)
Good idea! In addition this value can be lower without EU (0%?) and higher with NEU (100%?).Thargoid wrote:at maximum range it only gives 50% (for example)
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Yeah, but the damage has to drop off to nil at some point because it's rather unrealistic to go from hitting for even 50% damage to hitting for 0 damage.Thargoid wrote:Why not have the damage inflicted by the laser (of whatever flavour) be range-dependent? So at point-blank range it gives 100% of its damage level, but at maximum range it only gives 50% (for example).
Percentages and damage levels could be tweaked, but it perhaps offers a way to maintain the long range of the mil laser without making it unbalanced to NPCs.
A laser might do 100% of its max damage out to 50% range, only 50% damage at ~75% max range, and reducing to 0 damage at max range.
For a Pulse Laser, that's ~6.25 km range for its max damage, ~9.375 km for 50% damage, and 0 damage beyond 12.5 km.
For a Beam Laser, that's ~7.5 km range for its max damage, ~11.25 km for 50% damage, and 0 damage beyond 15 km.
For a Military Laser, that's ~15 km range for its max damage, ~22.5 km for 50% damage, and 0 damage beyond 30 km.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Switeck wrote:Yeah, but the damage has to drop off to nil at some point because it's rather unrealistic to go from hitting for even 50% damage to hitting for 0 damage.Thargoid wrote:Why not have the damage inflicted by the laser (of whatever flavour) be range-dependent? So at point-blank range it gives 100% of its damage level, but at maximum range it only gives 50% (for example).
Percentages and damage levels could be tweaked, but it perhaps offers a way to maintain the long range of the mil laser without making it unbalanced to NPCs.
A laser might do 100% of its max damage out to 50% range, only 50% damage at ~75% max range, and reducing to 0 damage at max range.
For a Pulse Laser, that's ~6.25 km range for its max damage, ~9.375 km for 50% damage, and 0 damage beyond 12.5 km.
For a Beam Laser, that's ~7.5 km range for its max damage, ~11.25 km for 50% damage, and 0 damage beyond 15 km.
For a Military Laser, that's ~15 km range for its max damage, ~22.5 km for 50% damage, and 0 damage beyond 30 km.
I would imagine that if that were implemented a lot of things would have to be tweaked so as to make sure the game wasn't too hard or too easy.
- Wildeblood
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 6:07 am
- Location: Western Australia
- Contact:
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
That's the first suggestion I've seen in this whole discussion that I like. It's always been wrong, and obviously so, that the laser beams have a definite end-point where their energy drops from 100% to 0 immediately. And the exact shape of the distance to power curve would give us something new to endlessly debate.Thargoid wrote:Why not have the damage inflicted by the laser (of whatever flavour) be range-dependent? So at point-blank range it gives 100% of its damage level, but at maximum range it only gives 50% (for example).
- maik
- Wiki Wizard
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:30 pm
- Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia (mainly industrial, feudal, TL12)
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Yep, this is something I could live with.Thargoid wrote:Why not have the damage inflicted by the laser (of whatever flavour) be range-dependent? So at point-blank range it gives 100% of its damage level, but at maximum range it only gives 50% (for example).
Percentages and damage levels could be tweaked, but it perhaps offers a way to maintain the long range of the mil laser without making it unbalanced to NPCs.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Definitely. The Constrictor Hunt mission would need a lot of testing, since a lot of the fighting in that is spent at long range.Falcon777 wrote:I would imagine that if that were implemented a lot of things would have to be tweaked so as to make sure the game wasn't too hard or too easy.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: equipment balancing and choices
Like the idea.Thargoid wrote:Why not have the damage inflicted by the laser (of whatever flavour) be range-dependent? So at point-blank range it gives 100% of its damage level, but at maximum range it only gives 50% (for example).
Percentages and damage levels could be tweaked, but it perhaps offers a way to maintain the long range of the mil laser without making it unbalanced to NPCs.