Diziet Sma wrote:Actually, a little digging around will turn up the rather interesting fact that the only State-owned CB in the world is Japan's.. (and you really should read the paper I linked to

)
UK, too, as Smivs says. Looking at the others: Australia and NZ are state-owned, Canada is a Crown Corporation (sole shareholder: the government), ECB is owned by the central banks of the Euro states, and the big two - Germany and France - are state-controlled (I haven't checked the rest, but they hold so little power it's irrelevant anyway). People's Bank of China is state-owned (as are many of their commercial banks). Russian CB oddly owns majority shares in a commercial bank, but is itself state-controlled. India's is owned by the government. Pakistan's was nationalised relatively recently compared with the rest, but still almost 40 years ago. Brazil's is owned by two government branches and one government-controlled bank.
The US really looks like the exception here, at least in terms of large economies (and even then the Federal Reserve is not a private corporation in the conventional sense either).
The paper ... I agree with their assertion that inflation is not usefully redistributive, and its useful effect on getting extremely rich entities to spend money does also lead to problems for individual personal-level savers. The rest of it, though:
- yes, in terms of real return, 4% investment with 2% inflation is numerically equivalent to 0% investment with 2% deflation. In practice the two are not equivalent with the wider economy: see Japan.
- recommending the
gold standard as the solution?! Or a fixed-volume currency, anyway, which has a whole bunch of disadvantages in the areas useful for currencies (e.g. mostly-stable price)
- definite US-centrism, and the US central banking system is a little odd
- seems to have at least some gut-level objection to electronic funds transfers.
- long digressions into analogies from physics and biology which don't seem to have a lot of relevance to the points they're making about economics.
(Which is not to say I think the global finance system is particularly good, but I think that's a problem of political priorities rather than the nature of the currency system)