Starfield
Moderators: winston, another_commander
Starfield
*enters
*looks around
'xcuse me, is this the right place?
*mumble, mumble*
Er, ok... This may be a matter of taste, but the sky in the game looks artificial to me. Personally, I'd prefer if it looked more realistic - only bright and much more numerous tiny silver specs, without those reddish-violet-something blotches that are supposed to act as "brighter" stars, but to me, at least, seem more like they come out of a cartoon, not at all the way they should look in a serious space simulation...
But, again, may be a matter of taste
*looks around
'xcuse me, is this the right place?
*mumble, mumble*
Er, ok... This may be a matter of taste, but the sky in the game looks artificial to me. Personally, I'd prefer if it looked more realistic - only bright and much more numerous tiny silver specs, without those reddish-violet-something blotches that are supposed to act as "brighter" stars, but to me, at least, seem more like they come out of a cartoon, not at all the way they should look in a serious space simulation...
But, again, may be a matter of taste
- JensAyton
- Grand Admiral Emeritus
- Posts: 6657
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Not true. While photos and film from Earth orbit or the Moon seldom show stars due to exposure issues, human beings who are actually there do see stars.drew wrote:Strictly speaking if you wanted it to be 'realistic' you'd not be able to see any stars at all with a bright planet, sun and ships flying around with megawatt laser beams out there!
Real starfields tend to be rather repetetive and dull, though. The nebulae make it easier to get your bearings. As for serious space sim… er, this isn’t one. Sorry.
E-mail: [email protected]
Hm, true, but on the other hand, the Sun pretty much blinds you... I guess having a starfield unless there is a sun in your viewscreen would require more coding...Ahruman wrote:Not true. While photos and film from Earth orbit or the Moon seldom show stars due to exposure issues, human beings who are actually there do see stars.drew wrote:Strictly speaking if you wanted it to be 'realistic' you'd not be able to see any stars at all with a bright planet, sun and ships flying around with megawatt laser beams out there!
As I said, a matter of taste. I think it would be a beautiful stage.Real starfields tend to be rather repetetive and dull, though.
I don't mind nebulae, on the contrary. I mind those violet dots that act as stars.The nebulae make it easier to get your bearings.
Can anyone guess how much processor time does the starfield calculation take depending on the actuall number of stars? What I mean is, if the starfield would be sufficiently dense - as is in reality - you could see enemy ships' "shadows", covering the stars as they pass in front of them...
- Arexack_Heretic
- Dangerous Subversive Element
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:32 pm
- Location: [%H] = Earth surface, Lattitude 52°10'58.19"N, longtitude 4°30'0.25"E.
- Contact:
Lensflares or loss of contrast* at having the local sun within 33degree arc of viewer centre?
Would add another degree of tactics to engaging the foe.
I don't really mind the stars... my grasp of oolite reality is fairly cartoonish anyhow. must be all the grubbing I did when I was less wise.
Oldstyle elite 'skins' were all in the mind.
*An automatic safety feature to prevent severe burns either to the viewport cameras or the pilot itself if inside an exposed cockpit.
Adaptive masking technologies are available, but add the risk of missing the flares of missile exhausts.
Would add another degree of tactics to engaging the foe.
I don't really mind the stars... my grasp of oolite reality is fairly cartoonish anyhow. must be all the grubbing I did when I was less wise.
Oldstyle elite 'skins' were all in the mind.
*An automatic safety feature to prevent severe burns either to the viewport cameras or the pilot itself if inside an exposed cockpit.
Adaptive masking technologies are available, but add the risk of missing the flares of missile exhausts.
Riding the Rocket!
- drew
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 9:29 am
- Location: In front of a laptop writing a book.
- Contact:
I would be very skeptical of any claims that you could see stars anytime the bright sun or fully illuminated nearby planet is in the sky. Behind a planet or in deep shadow away from the sun, yes granted.Not true. While photos and film from Earth orbit or the Moon seldom show stars due to exposure issues, human beings who are actually there do see stars.
Don't discount cockpit illumination either. As an astronomer I use a laptop occasionally at night to do CCD imaging and it completely knackers your night vision. Even with the brightness turned down to minimum and a filter inplace you're only left with the brightest stars for a minute or so.
I've always assumed the 'on screen' isn't just a window, but some kind of computer enhanced display, which balances out the brightness levels for you, thus the sun doesn't blind you when you're scooping and you can 'see' in the dark.
Cheers,
Drew.
- Selezen
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:14 am
- Location: Tionisla
- Contact:
That's the way I have always seen it too. That accounts for the layout of the bridge as seen in the manual (which has a chair with a single screen in front) and the fact that you can access all viewpoints from the console.drew wrote:I've always assumed the 'on screen' isn't just a window, but some kind of computer enhanced display, which balances out the brightness levels for you, thus the sun doesn't blind you when you're scooping and you can 'see' in the dark.
As I've said before, I've always thought of the visible "windows" on some ships to be solar panels or some such...
- JensAyton
- Grand Admiral Emeritus
- Posts: 6657
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Promenade decks.
(That said, expecting scale in Oolite to make sense is an exercise in frustration. Deal.)
(That said, expecting scale in Oolite to make sense is an exercise in frustration. Deal.)
E-mail: [email protected]
- Captain Hesperus
- Grand High Clock-Tower Poobah
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:10 pm
- Location: Anywhere I can sell Trumbles.....
- Arexack_Heretic
- Dangerous Subversive Element
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:32 pm
- Location: [%H] = Earth surface, Lattitude 52°10'58.19"N, longtitude 4°30'0.25"E.
- Contact:
- Commander McLane
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 9520
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:08 am
- Location: a Hacker Outpost in a moderately remote area
- Contact: