Eye candy

General discussion for players of Oolite.

Moderators: winston, another_commander

Well?

Eyecandy good!
15
43%
Meh, slow steady, make our own style.
20
57%
 
Total votes: 35

User avatar
ADCK
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:30 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by ADCK »

It's probably just HDRR lighting (3D light, unlike Oolites fake lights done with glows) or perhaps just Bloom...
There's definatly some dynamic lighting going on there (plasma cannons lighting up the hull when hitting, etc)

None of which can be done in Oolite... it can be faked to a certain degree, but no where near as good as that.

As for smooth in Oolite, it could be better...
There's only 1 light source in Oolite at any time (the sun)
and no self-shadows or shadows at all...

Lighting and the suns/stars are my biggest gripe with Oolite, there's only so much you can do with effects maps.
User avatar
Svengali
Commander
Commander
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:52 pm

Post by Svengali »

ADCK wrote:
As for smooth in Oolite, it could be better...
There's only 1 light source in Oolite at any time (the sun)
and no self-shadows or shadows at all...
2 lights.-)
another_commander
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 6683
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:54 am

Post by another_commander »

ADCK wrote:
Lighting and the suns/stars are my biggest gripe with Oolite, there's only so much you can do with effects maps.
I can understand the suns, but what is wrong with the stars?
User avatar
ADCK
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:30 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by ADCK »

another_commander wrote:
ADCK wrote:
Lighting and the suns/stars are my biggest gripe with Oolite, there's only so much you can do with effects maps.
I can understand the suns, but what is wrong with the stars?
technically suns are stars...
I didn't mean the background image, that's fine.
I say "suns/stars" cause some people call 'em suns, some call 'em stars, I call 'em big spheres of flaming gas!
User avatar
Kaks
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 3009
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Big Smoke

Post by Kaks »

ADCK wrote:
and no self-shadows or shadows at all...
I beg to differ! :)
If you'd like to try out a recent ( rev2964+ ) trunk build, you'll be able to notice shadows. Move behind any big enough object to blot the sun, and you should notice a remarkable lack of sunlight on your hull.

Self shadows & more than one light source (either another sun or enabling light emitting oxp models) are not likely to be implemented too quickly though.
On a positive note, we are considering the possibility of using 3d engine libraries instead of the home brewed one for after the (mythical) next stable release. That would definitely improve the shadows situation! (and definitely well within the decade! ;) )
Hey, free OXPs: farsun v1.05 & tty v0.5! :0)
User avatar
Lucidor
Deadly
Deadly
Posts: 244
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:59 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by Lucidor »

Any particular engine? Ogre perhaps?
User avatar
Kaks
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 3009
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Big Smoke

Post by Kaks »

Ogre is a nice engine. However, we haven't got to the next release yet, much less to the next stable release. Once we do have a stable release, we can start having a proper look at the various options.

If anyone wants to do a bit of research on the various 3D engines pros & cons, by all means! :)
Hey, free OXPs: farsun v1.05 & tty v0.5! :0)
User avatar
ADCK
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:30 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by ADCK »

Kaks wrote:
ADCK wrote:
and no self-shadows or shadows at all...
I beg to differ! :)
If you'd like to try out a recent ( rev2964+ ) trunk build, you'll be able to notice shadows. Move behind any big enough object to blot the sun, and you should notice a remarkable lack of sunlight on your hull.
I didn't expect that! Good to hear.
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Post by DaddyHoggy »

Kaks wrote:
Ogre is a nice engine. However, we haven't got to the next release yet, much less to the next stable release. Once we do have a stable release, we can start having a proper look at the various options.

If anyone wants to do a bit of research on the various 3D engines pros & cons, by all means! :)
Delta3D (supported by the US DoD and used in military spec training sims - effectively a collection of Open Source libraries brought under one banner)

http://www.delta3d.org/ - our PhD student has just built a driving sim with it and an entity generator (AI crowd output under DIS)
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
ADCK
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:30 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by ADCK »

Kaks wrote:
ADCK wrote:
and no self-shadows or shadows at all...
I beg to differ! :)
If you'd like to try out a recent ( rev2964+ ) trunk build, you'll be able to notice shadows. Move behind any big enough object to blot the sun, and you should notice a remarkable lack of sunlight on your hull.

Self shadows & more than one light source (either another sun or enabling light emitting oxp models) are not likely to be implemented too quickly though.
On a positive note, we are considering the possibility of using 3d engine libraries instead of the home brewed one for after the (mythical) next stable release. That would definitely improve the shadows situation! (and definitely well within the decade! ;) )
Finally got around to testing this out, not quite what i expected, the transition form shadowed to non-shdowed is instantaneous... Perhaps some sort of fade-in fade-out could be added? Otherwise, good job :P
Sure it's accurate, but since the engine doesn't support actual shadows (eg no half in half out of shadows. either all in our all out) it looks odd with no transition between them.
User avatar
Kaks
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 3009
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Big Smoke

Post by Kaks »

Apart from the amount of unavailable extra time it would require, providing per-fragment shadows (which is part of what is needed for 'actual' shadows) would very easily render all currently shaderified ships 'broken'. The way it was implemented was specifically to avoid any such breakage...
Hey, free OXPs: farsun v1.05 & tty v0.5! :0)
User avatar
ADCK
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:30 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by ADCK »

Ah OK. Well if that talk of getting the game switched over to a new graphics engine ever actually leads to a new engine (which likely wont happen for a long long time) I hope this gets revisited :P
User avatar
Poro
Deadly
Deadly
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:51 am
Location: Don't look in your aft view...
Contact:

Post by Poro »

Would I be right in thinking that for those of us running Oolite on hardware with precisely zero pixel shaders, the base game with OXPs such as System Redux, Sung's textures, the upcoming DeepSpace non-shady textures: the game looks about as good as it's going to get?

P.S. I'm not playing right now, but does the lighting shade the whole polygon, or does it shade per vertex? (Not referring to vertex shaders)
User avatar
JensAyton
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by JensAyton »

Poro wrote:
Would I be right in thinking that for those of us running Oolite on hardware with precisely zero pixel shaders, the base game with OXPs such as System Redux, Sung's textures, the upcoming DeepSpace non-shady textures: the game looks about as good as it's going to get?
There might be improvements to shaderless mode at some point, such as light maps.
Poro wrote:
P.S. I'm not playing right now, but does the lighting shade the whole polygon, or does it shade per vertex? (Not referring to vertex shaders)
Per-vertex, although most objects use per-polygon normals, so this makes little difference. (Objects with normal smoothing include asteroids and the “arc details” around the docking bay on the built-in Coriolis.)
User avatar
Griff
Oolite 2 Art Director
Oolite 2 Art Director
Posts: 2483
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: Probably hugging his Air Fryer

Post by Griff »

a fab boiling sun shader spotted in you tubes 'you might also be interested in these videos' list whilst i was gawping at the Oolite vids linked to on the smashing new website:
http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~m ... rials&id=1
Post Reply