OS wars

Off topic discussion zone.

Moderators: winston, another_commander, Cody

User avatar
wackyman465
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 831
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Currently hunting you down in an Imperial Courier

Post by wackyman465 »

So?
I shot him back first. That is to say, I read his mind and fired before he would have fired on me. No, sir, he wasn't a fugitive.
User avatar
pagroove
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 3035
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:52 pm
Location: On a famous planet

Post by pagroove »

Again off topic--but reaction to messages just above this message--

In terms of Flight characteristics X-plane is a sim and not a game. I think the behavior is better than Flight simulator 2004. So while the web site does not look so nice the sim is good for simulating an airliner. Fs2004 is now fully developed by the community. For example check http://www.flightsim.com. There are dozens and dozens of add ons for it. And when Fsx came out it was a bit of a let down in the realism department. M$ contracted more on making animated elephants in Africa (really) than flightsim behavior and it was aimed more at the gaming market. The FS-Community proves that a community can get every last bit out of a game and therefore it was a let down that MS pretended to support the community but when FSX came out it was more a FlightsimGame than a Flightsim.

@Daddyhoggy and Cmndr Wyvern

Don't forget the new versions of Falcon also

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_4.0:_Allied_Force

So there are more flightsim platforms than one might think.

==========of topic mode off=================
For P.A. Groove's music check
https://soundcloud.com/p-a-groove
Famous Planets v 2.7. (for Povray)
Image
https://bb.oolite.space/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=13709
Post Reply