Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mode

General discussion for players of Oolite.

Moderators: winston, another_commander

User avatar
cim
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 4072
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 6:19 pm

Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mode

Post by cim »

Here's the first of five planned posts on proposals for changes to future Oolite versions. The others will follow as I get round to them.

Two important notes before I start on the details:
  • This is not a statement that 1.78 is close to release. I've just been promising to share these proposals for ages and finally got round to cleaning them up. You're probably as tired of the vague hints I've been giving about their content as I am.
  • These are just the major areas I personally plan to work on for 1.79/1.80. It's not a commitment that they'll actually happen for that release, it's not any statement in any direction about what the other devs intend to do for that release, and it doesn't exclude work on other minor things by me for that release. They're just big pieces of work where I want to find out what the community thinks before spending time coding them, to make sure I haven't missed anything important.
So, with that out of the way, and starting with the simplest one to describe, the first proposal is:
Remove 'Strict Mode' and all related code from the game.
(The 'Energy Bomb' equipment would still be re-addable by OXP and does not count as "related code" in this context!)

Problem
Strict Mode is not very strict - there are noticeable and often substantial differences from any version of Elite in terms of ship AI and behaviour, witchspace physics, weapon power, ship specs, legal system, and so on.

It also creates a maintenance workload. Every new feature added to the game should be considered to see if it needs exempting from Strict Mode, and if so, extra code paths need adding to do this. In practice, we don't actually do this much, so the current Strict Mode has some oddities and bugs as a result. (For example, maintenance: as we all know the maintenance overhaul is not purchasable in Strict Mode. That does not mean that your ship does not suffer wear and tear and need maintaining. It just means you can't do anything about it.)

Proposal
The current effects of Strict Mode can be duplicated (more-or-less) by OXP. Therefore, release an OXP which implements the 1.78-style of Strict Mode, and remove the actual mode from the code.

As an bonus, Strict Mode players can then include their favourite shipset and planet texture set (and indeed any other purely decorative OXPs).

Alternatively, Strict Mode players can stick with 1.78 indefinitely for those games - there's nothing really useful future versions would do anyway.
User avatar
Cody
Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
Posts: 16081
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:31 pm
Location: The Lizard's Claw
Contact:

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Cody »

Sounds like a very sensible proposal to me, cim. I doubt that many players use strict mode anyway. <awaits howls of protest>
I do use it very occasionly, but only to test something without OXPs (and that can easily be done another way).
I would advise stilts for the quagmires, and camels for the snowy hills
And any survivors, their debts I will certainly pay. There's always a way!
User avatar
Svengali
Commander
Commander
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Svengali »

Yep - removing strict mode sounds good for me.
User avatar
Smivs
Retired Assassin
Retired Assassin
Posts: 8408
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Lost in space
Contact:

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Smivs »

I too wonder how many players actually use Strict Mode. Perhaps we need a poll :wink:
If it is effectively redundant, and its removal would make life much easier the option should be considered.
The game is developing and evolving at quite a rapid pace currently, and I personally have been thinking more and more recently that perhaps we are getting close to a time when it really does need to move away from some of the Elite heritage. This represents a big change of opinion on my part, but I now feel that being so anchored in the past is going to present more problems in the future, particularly in terms of what the game could become if it was a bit more free to be itself rather than trying to be something that was.
We all know the key features that make Oolite what it is - the open-ended gameplay, the general 'model' of trading/combat, the ability to do whatever you want in the game (and the way the game sometimes plays with you as much as you play with it) and the non-Newtonian Oo-physics. These must be preserved, and also changes should continue to be measured in terms of gameplay, so 'cheats' like laser boosters should never be considered.
I'm not suggesting resurrecting Oolite 2, but a debate about where the game should be going could be beneficial. I am NOT suggesting another proposal-fest like we had a while ago though. That was turning into a free-for-all and is probably the thing that killed-off Oolite 2 in the end. But I do wonder if a measured debate about ways the game could continue to evolve along its own path while still tipping a nod to its Elite heritage might be appropriate at this time.
Commander Smivs, the friendliest Gourd this side of Riedquat.
User avatar
Commander McLane
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 9520
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:08 am
Location: a Hacker Outpost in a moderately remote area
Contact:

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Commander McLane »

A heads-up from me as well.

As you all probably know, the Elite legacy is very important for me, and I think that Oolite should always be rooted in Elite. Therefore I've always valued and loved the idea of strict mode—that essentially Oolite is Elite, and can be played just like Elite (with the known caveats). However, having said that, I also have to confess that I've never actually played in strict mode. Perhaps tried it once in order to see how it looks, but never actually done anything with it. So, for me, strict mode has always been a mental or psychological thing rather than an actual part of the game: Sort of a grateful nod to Elite, built into the most basic level of the game, the options menu.

And while I'm holding this nod in high regard as a very noble gesture, it should not become a liability for the future development of Oolite. The gesture should stay, but it can take on another form. It doesn't need to be in the form of a difficult-to-maintain game mode (which I'm not using anyway).
User avatar
JazHaz
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2991
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:07 am
Location: Enfield, Middlesex
Contact:

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by JazHaz »

Just created a poll, here.
User avatar
CommRLock78
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 1138
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:35 pm
Location: US
Contact:

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by CommRLock78 »

IIRC, Captain Solo said he plays only strict mode, so I'm sure there are others. Probably a bad idea I'd say, since some die-hards may wish to play the game in strict mode.
"I'll laser the mark all while munching a fistful of popcorn." - Markgräf von Ededleen, Marquess, Brutal Great One, Assassins' Guild Exterminator
---------------------------
At the helm of the Caduceus Omega, 'Murderous Morrígan'
User avatar
Cody
Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
Posts: 16081
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:31 pm
Location: The Lizard's Claw
Contact:

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Cody »

CommRLock78 wrote:
IIRC, Captain Solo said he plays only strict mode...
I'd be very surprised, seeing as how the old codger produces his own OXPs.
CommRLock78 wrote:
Probably a bad idea I'd say, since some die-hards may wish to play the game in strict mode.
Which, as cim states, can be duplicated by an OXP:
cim wrote:
The current effects of Strict Mode can be duplicated (more-or-less) by OXP. Therefore, release an OXP which implements the 1.78-style of Strict Mode
I would advise stilts for the quagmires, and camels for the snowy hills
And any survivors, their debts I will certainly pay. There's always a way!
User avatar
Disembodied
Jedi Spam Assassin
Jedi Spam Assassin
Posts: 6885
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:54 pm
Location: Carter's Snort

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Disembodied »

A Strict Mode OXP makes vastly more sense, I think. Any real retro-enthusiast can download an emulator and play the original.
User avatar
cim
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 4072
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by cim »

Disembodied wrote:
A Strict Mode OXP makes vastly more sense, I think. Any real retro-enthusiast can download an emulator and play the original.
Here's the current state of the OXP, by the way. There are still some differences between it and Strict Mode, and I might need to add the occasional bit of functionality to clean some of them up, but they're mostly fairly minor.
User avatar
maik
Wiki Wizard
Wiki Wizard
Posts: 2028
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:30 pm
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia (mainly industrial, feudal, TL12)

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by maik »

Good suggestion. Never used it.
User avatar
Thargoid
Thargoid
Thargoid
Posts: 5528
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:55 pm

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Thargoid »

It maybe could make sense to have the OXP "tick-box" install in a similar way that debug OXP does. But default not selected in-game, but maybe have a similar menu selection line as now which greys out if the OXP isn't installed. That way from a user view point aside from ticking (or not, I'd make it unticked by default) there'd be very little difference to what we have now, at least in setting it up to run in strict mode.
User avatar
aegidian
Master and Commander
Master and Commander
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by aegidian »

A 'strict mode OXP' does not solve the development problem of determining if a piece of code should check for 'strict mode', and as such would have to be updated for each feature. Such a suggestion is essentially 'lets fork the code here, and let some other poor soul maintain strict mode for us'. I don't think the idea has any legs.

Now, I'm a traditionalist, and I would prefer to keep some way of playing old-school Elite within Oolite's core features. That said, old-school Elite varied from implementation to implementation (contrast Atari ST Elite with Commodore 64 Elite and Electron Elite and you'll find a wealth of differences) so Oolite having different features doesn't exempt it from being old-school particularly.

I also have to add the mea culpa that I added features to Oolite's main code, that, if I were implementing them for Oolite now, I would add as an OXP (ECM hardened missiles and fuel injectors, for example) so that the base code remained closer to 'core Elite' anyway. But I was lazy and didn't, sorry.


So... and it kills a little bit of me to say it... forget strict mode, and please forget trying to maintain a 'strict mode OXP'.

Strict mode should be replaced with an All-OXPs-Off option, perhaps maintained within the saved game as 'strict'.
"The planet Rear is scourged by well-intentioned OXZs."

Oolite models and gear? click here!
User avatar
Ranthe
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 330
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:35 pm
Location: Paraparaumu, New Zealand (TL 8, Rich Agricultural, Multi-Government)

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Ranthe »

aegidian wrote:
So... and it kills a little bit of me to say it... forget strict mode, and please forget trying to maintain a 'strict mode OXP'.

Strict mode should be replaced with an All-OXPs-Off option, perhaps maintained within the saved game as 'strict'.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Commander Ranthe: Flying the Anaconda-class transport Atomic Annie through Galaxy 2.
Combat Ranking: Dangerous
"Big ships take more booty on your interstellar flights..."
User avatar
Diziet Sma
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 6312
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:20 pm
Location: Aboard the Pitviper S.E. "Blackwidow"

Re: Proposals for Oolite 1.79/1.80, 1 of 5: Remove Strict Mo

Post by Diziet Sma »

Gets a green light from me.. I've never used strict mode, and from the poll results to date, neither does anyone else.

For me, it's much as Commander McLane put it.. the simple fact that it was possible to play "original" style Elite was largely a psychological nod to the past.. no less important for that, but it ought not to impede the growth of Oolite.
Most games have some sort of paddling-pool-and-water-wings beginning to ease you in: Oolite takes the rather more Darwinian approach of heaving you straight into the ocean, often with a brick or two in your pockets for luck. ~ Disembodied
Post Reply