I decided that I had enough ships of this group to make a package oxp with them. They include the BigBlimpy, and SmallBlimy, a big nasty shipper with ball turrets called Gnash, a streaking fast fighter/escort called the Razzer, a rather huge liner called the AlphaCentauri, and a really stupid, but surprisingly successful ship called the Splatomator. The two Blimpys have been previously released, so if you download this and put it into your AddOns file, you should remove the individual versions first, if you have them. I have put pictures up of all these ships in my ongoing thread "Mandotech Ind.", but I'll include a pic of each ship here under the names.
https://www.box.com/s/w29y0onvm4qdj72meees
Here are some stats:
SHIP Max Speed Max Energy Energy Recharge Rate Thrust Max Cargo
AlphaCentauri 250 300 3.0 25 300
BigBlimpy 250 500 3.0 15 500
Gnash 350 600 5.5 30 90
Razzer 500 300 2.75 65 5
SmallBlimpy 250 500 3.0 15 400
Splatomator 250 500 3.0 15 600
SCREEN SHOTS:
AlphaCentauri
BigBlimpy
Gnash
Razzer
Splatomator
[RELEASE] Mandotech Ovoids
Moderators: winston, another_commander
[RELEASE] Mandotech Ovoids
Last edited by mandoman on Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Dangerous
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:38 pm
- Location: Rich Agricultural - Mainly Liquors/wines - Burgondy France
Re: [RELEASE] Mandotech Ovoids
Nice set of ships, Mandoman, thanks!
They will populate my ooniverse tonight
They will populate my ooniverse tonight
Re: [RELEASE] Mandotech Ovoids
Fantastic. If you get a good look at the AlphaCentauri, let me know if it is behaving like a liner, rather than a trader. I've spotted it a couple of times with it's escorts, but wasn't really sure if it was doing what the AI orders.
Re: [RELEASE] Mandotech Ovoids
I was putting together a Wiki page for this oxp, when I stumbled onto the fact that the AlphaCentauri didn't have any max anything, or even a energy_recharge_rate. That has been corrected, and a couple other little things that I thought should be changed slightly. The link for the corrected version is above. Sorry for the hassle.