There are holes in the fence!

Off topic discussion zone.

Moderators: winston, another_commander, Cody

Post Reply
User avatar
Cmdr. Maegil
Sword-toting nut-job
Sword-toting nut-job
Posts: 1294
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: On the mend in Western Africa

There are holes in the fence!

Post by Cmdr. Maegil »

We've recently seen evidence that there either are indeed human spambots paid to register on forums or the bot programmers themselves have, ahem, "issues".
This isn't to say that bots nowadays can't break recaptchas. With a quick googling, I found a site claiming "a total success rate of 17.5 percent against reCAPTCHA" in early 2008; the amount of spammers we're getting says things got worse since then...

What are the latest developments in this area?
You know those who, having been mugged and stabbed, fired, dog run over, house burned down, wife eloped with best friend, daughters becoming prostitutes and their countries invaded - still say that "all is well"?
I'm obviously not one of them.
User avatar
Disembodied
Jedi Spam Assassin
Jedi Spam Assassin
Posts: 6885
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:54 pm
Location: Carter's Snort

Re: There are holes in the fence!

Post by Disembodied »

Cmdr. Maegil wrote:
We've recently seen evidence that there either are indeed human spambots paid to register on forums or the bot programmers themselves have, ahem, "issues".
This isn't to say that bots nowadays can't break recaptchas. With a quick googling, I found a site claiming "a total success rate of 17.5 percent against reCAPTCHA" in early 2008; the amount of spammers we're getting says things got worse since then...

What are the latest developments in this area?
I see a lot of claims for how to break reCAPTCHA ... then again, there are a lot of claims for foolproof methods to, ahem, adjust appendage size, too. The latest piece of reliable reporting that I've seen, from New Scientist, 19 October 2011, suggests that although many CAPTCHAs are breakable, so far reCAPTCHA is proving too difficult for automatic cracking:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... ptcha.html
The team tested their software on 15 sites, including Google, eBay and Wikipedia. Schemes are usually deemed secure if they can be broken less than 0.01 per cent of the time. Bursztein easily cracked many of the CAPTCHAs he studied, breaking the likes of eBay 37 per cent of the time and Wikipedia 25 per cent of the time. The only sites to resist attack were Google, and sites using Google's more recent iteration, reCAPTCHA.
I think the proof of the pudding lies here in the fact that we're not swarmed by bots. If reCAPTCHA was (easily) cracked by software then we'd see a lot more of them, I would guess. Currently we're only running at somewhere between half-a-dozen to a dozen a day, and many of those never complete the final email hurdle and actually register.
User avatar
Cody
Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
Posts: 16081
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:31 pm
Location: The Lizard's Claw
Contact:

Re: There are holes in the fence!

Post by Cody »

There will always be some holes in any fence! When the reCaptcha was disabled for a trial period, I was certainly killing more of them... it definitely works.
I would advise stilts for the quagmires, and camels for the snowy hills
And any survivors, their debts I will certainly pay. There's always a way!
User avatar
Selezen
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2530
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Tionisla
Contact:

Re: There are holes in the fence!

Post by Selezen »

On a somewhat related note:

Image
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Re: There are holes in the fence!

Post by DaddyHoggy »

Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
Post Reply