We've recently seen evidence that there either are indeed human spambots paid to register on forums or the bot programmers themselves have, ahem, "issues".
This isn't to say that bots nowadays can't break recaptchas. With a quick googling, I found a site claiming "a total success rate of 17.5 percent against reCAPTCHA" in early 2008; the amount of spammers we're getting says things got worse since then...
What are the latest developments in this area?
There are holes in the fence!
Moderators: winston, another_commander, Cody
- Cmdr. Maegil
- Sword-toting nut-job
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: On the mend in Western Africa
There are holes in the fence!
You know those who, having been mugged and stabbed, fired, dog run over, house burned down, wife eloped with best friend, daughters becoming prostitutes and their countries invaded - still say that "all is well"?
I'm obviously not one of them.
I'm obviously not one of them.
- Disembodied
- Jedi Spam Assassin
- Posts: 6885
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:54 pm
- Location: Carter's Snort
Re: There are holes in the fence!
I see a lot of claims for how to break reCAPTCHA ... then again, there are a lot of claims for foolproof methods to, ahem, adjust appendage size, too. The latest piece of reliable reporting that I've seen, from New Scientist, 19 October 2011, suggests that although many CAPTCHAs are breakable, so far reCAPTCHA is proving too difficult for automatic cracking:Cmdr. Maegil wrote:We've recently seen evidence that there either are indeed human spambots paid to register on forums or the bot programmers themselves have, ahem, "issues".
This isn't to say that bots nowadays can't break recaptchas. With a quick googling, I found a site claiming "a total success rate of 17.5 percent against reCAPTCHA" in early 2008; the amount of spammers we're getting says things got worse since then...
What are the latest developments in this area?
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... ptcha.html
I think the proof of the pudding lies here in the fact that we're not swarmed by bots. If reCAPTCHA was (easily) cracked by software then we'd see a lot more of them, I would guess. Currently we're only running at somewhere between half-a-dozen to a dozen a day, and many of those never complete the final email hurdle and actually register.The team tested their software on 15 sites, including Google, eBay and Wikipedia. Schemes are usually deemed secure if they can be broken less than 0.01 per cent of the time. Bursztein easily cracked many of the CAPTCHAs he studied, breaking the likes of eBay 37 per cent of the time and Wikipedia 25 per cent of the time. The only sites to resist attack were Google, and sites using Google's more recent iteration, reCAPTCHA.
- Cody
- Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
- Posts: 16081
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:31 pm
- Location: The Lizard's Claw
- Contact:
Re: There are holes in the fence!
There will always be some holes in any fence! When the reCaptcha was disabled for a trial period, I was certainly killing more of them... it definitely works.
I would advise stilts for the quagmires, and camels for the snowy hills
And any survivors, their debts I will certainly pay. There's always a way!
And any survivors, their debts I will certainly pay. There's always a way!
- Selezen
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:14 am
- Location: Tionisla
- Contact:
Re: There are holes in the fence!
On a somewhat related note:
- DaddyHoggy
- Intergalactic Spam Assassin
- Posts: 8515
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
- Location: Newbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: There are holes in the fence!
Also relevant: http://mashable.com/2011/11/17/worst-in ... passwords/
Oolite Life is now revealed hereSelezen wrote:Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.