OT? Oolite simpit

An area for discussing new ideas and additions to Oolite.

Moderators: winston, another_commander

User avatar
Evil Juice
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Florence, Italy

OT? Oolite simpit

Post by Evil Juice »

I'm obsessed by the idea of building a cockpit "replica" of a cobra mkIII. That would need the ability to send graphical data to multiple screens (i.e. front, radar-various astrogation functions, sides, rear). Would this be implementable in Oolite? is there a way to plot data on different screens given a lightning fast machine with multiple video cards?
Target lost
User avatar
Murgh
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 6:19 am
Location: Terra Firma

Post by Murgh »

you mean like an all-views-simultaneously screen, with expanded GUI?
The man next to you is your lunch
User avatar
aegidian
Master and Commander
Master and Commander
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: OT? Oolite simpit

Post by aegidian »

Evil Juice wrote:
I'm obsessed by the idea of building a cockpit "replica" of a cobra mkIII. That would need the ability to send graphical data to multiple screens (i.e. front, radar-various astrogation functions, sides, rear). Would this be implementable in Oolite? is there a way to plot data on different screens given a lightning fast machine with multiple video cards?
Wow - that's a wild idea.

There's no multi-screen support in Oolite ATM (and I'd have no idea how to do it).

But I'd be in favour of the cheap and cheerful approach of sending the same video signal to a bunch of cheap monitors and adjusting the height and width of the scan on each to show only the required element.

In theory the Objective C HeadUpDisplay object could be edited to send its output to various lights and dials (if I knew how the Cocoa/Hardware interface worked), or possibly to separate NSViews in windows on a separate screen... In theory this could even be done with the different directional view displays - each one rendered to a separate custom NSOpenGLView...

*ponders*

I'd do it if I had the hardware/budget/spare time.
"The planet Rear is scourged by well-intentioned OXZs."

Oolite models and gear? click here!
User avatar
winston
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: Port St. Mary, Isle of Man
Contact:

Post by winston »

In flight sims, often networked computers have provided multi screen support. But for that, Oolite would need to support being networked :-)
User avatar
aegidian
Master and Commander
Master and Commander
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Post by aegidian »

winston wrote:
In flight sims, often networked computers have provided multi screen support. But for that, Oolite would need to support being networked :-)
mmm. Of course Oolite could fairly easily be adapted with a server object running in a separate thread written to respond to simple TCIP/IP requests like an HTTP GET request with the necessary information for simple dials (rather than the full details necessary to draw an external view).

(Tiger sidetrack - then your dials could be Dashboard Widgets - NO No No!)

I wrote an NNTP client once me.
"The planet Rear is scourged by well-intentioned OXZs."

Oolite models and gear? click here!
User avatar
JensAyton
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by JensAyton »

The networking necessary for multi-headed simulation is simpler than for a game, since you don’t have to handle multiple players, or send input from clients to server if the server is connected directly to the input devices.

Multi-screen simulation on a single machine is conceptually simpler, but the question then arises whether you can have OpenGL contexts on different display cards share resources. If not – and I suspect not – you’d be limited to two OpenGL screens with Oolite’s current model. On the other hand, when I get around to reimplementing meshes and materials in a more object-oriented way, keeping track of display lists, texture names etc. on a per-context basis would be relatively easy. ;-)
flap
Above Average
Above Average
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:27 pm

Post by flap »

Not that far from that idea, I'd love to have a rearview mirror, or something like that : In the main view, you would have a kind of tiny window opened showing what is happening behind you or on the side.

It could be a device to be bought in some stations... You could buy a left, right, top, down or back "rearview mirror". If you've got all of them, you can be sure that you won't see much of what's in front of you !

Also, in the view you've got with F1 to F4, is not possible to include top and down view ? It would quite usefull when you want to turn around something.
User avatar
Evil Juice
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Florence, Italy

Post by Evil Juice »

i remember seeing a cutout technical drawing of an escape pod with an astrogation console fitted in it, it would be quite interesting to have a look at ita again, it was in a site about ArcElite but i didn't bookmark it and google is no help, someone has seen this graph?
Target lost
User avatar
Spooky
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:05 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Contact:

Post by Spooky »

Spooky stares longingly at his Onyx running SGI's fabulous OpenGL Performer environment.

http://www.sgi.com/products/software/performer/
It gives you the capability to scale easily to multiple processors and multiple graphics pipelines, deploy to a wide range of systems and price points, and be ready-made for the graphics systems of today and the future.
Ok, so it's not cheap... but they could do with the money :wink:
Spooky
www.int13h.com
Evil Genius

The most merciful thing in all the world is the inability of the human mind to correlate all of its contents.
User avatar
Evil Juice
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Florence, Italy

Post by Evil Juice »

isn't it a little bit overkill? /me drools...
Target lost
User avatar
Rxke
Retired Assassin
Retired Assassin
Posts: 1760
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Belgium

Post by Rxke »

Spooky wrote:
Ok, so it's not cheap... but they could do with the money :wink:
Looks like my sig is overly pessimistic, at least SGI themselves think they'll be around for quite awhile yet, their cookies are good until 2026! :lol:
User avatar
Evil Juice
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Florence, Italy

Post by Evil Juice »

For the time being i'm having a look at these industrial heavy-duty OEM joysticks (the ones you use to drive caterpillars, forklifts etc...)

http://www.chproducts.com/oem_flash/index.html

made by CH, they're much better than their gaming counterparts and are USB compliant. The look is astonishingly retro.

The throttles aren't bad too.

EDIT: http://www.chproducts.com/retail/aircraft.html <--- really overkill
Target lost
User avatar
TedJ
Deadly
Deadly
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:18 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by TedJ »

Not all gaming joysticks are created equal.

http://europe.thrustmaster.com/eng/d_pr ... =T65&fam=6

I'd love one of these, except for the fact that I'm an unco leftie... ;)
User avatar
Evil Juice
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Florence, Italy

Post by Evil Juice »

Yeah, right, but for the sake of good production design i believe that in a simulated cockpit a forklift joystick would be not bad, i wonder if USB-overdrive would handle 'em.

have a look at this: this guy is nuts, look at the CD tray!
http://www.migman.com/hw/cp/simpit/simpit.htm
Target lost
xaotik
Above Average
Above Average
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:37 am
Location: Crete, Greece

Post by xaotik »

aegidian wrote:
mmm. Of course Oolite could fairly easily be adapted with a server object running in a separate thread written to respond to simple TCIP/IP requests like an HTTP GET request with the necessary information for simple dials (rather than the full details necessary to draw an external view).
I wanted to pose a similar suggestion earlier this week, but reconsidered since it sounded a bit "too much". :-)

In a driving simulator called Live For Speed that I play from time to time they have an interesting concept for interfacing external software to the game called InSim and another called OutSim for interfacing to motion platforms.

Both of those basically work with UDP packets being sent (if the player enables it) containing all sorts of event-related data and they allow a program to send in certain stuff too - either messages or commands to control the game using a sort of "console" approach. That way, with external programs any game extensions are not part of the main game.
Post Reply