TGHC wrote:Commander McLane wrote:TGHC wrote:And to top it all the
wiki is wrong
It isn't wrong as such, the box is only missing the 'Poor' rank. It's only the ranking for FE2/FFE anyway.
The
wiki got it right for Oolite's ranking (as does the Reference Sheet).
We're both right, we are looking at different pages on the Wiki, yours is entitled Elite Ratings, the one I am referring to
here is entitled Elite Rankings, and is wrong so I suggest it should be deleted since they are duplicating each other.
No, they're not duplicating each other, which was exactly my point. Please keep in mind that the Elite Wiki is dedicated to
all things Elitey, and Oolite is only a small part of it. The [wiki]Elite Rankings[/wiki] page is part of the FE2/FFE-sections of the Wiki, and is only supposed to display the rankings for these two games, which it correctly does, except that the 'Poor' ranking is left out. At the bottom of the page it is marked as being in the categories 'FE2' and 'FFE',
not in the categories 'Elite' or 'Oolite', therefore it is solely concerned with the rankings as they were in FE2 and FFE. And the rankings given are indeed a perfect match with the 'FE2/FFE'-column on Jades' page you linked to before (except the missing 'Poor' rating).
The [wiki]Elite Ratings[/wiki] page, however, refers to the rating system of Oolite ('the
current system'), which it again captures correctly.
What could be done, perhaps, is to combine these two pages into one single page, which would contain the ranking systems for all versions of Elite/Frontier/Oolite.