This is quite clever.

here · Post by **Fatleaf** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:33 pm

Read the link to the video to understand what they are doing. But I thought it was brilliant in its simplicity of design. Could prove quite useful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPv47h8w ... ture=feedu

Rxke · Post by **Rxke** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:58 pm

Cool, but worst.video.evar!

You just sit through a totally uninteresting and pointless timelapse video, and at the end there's barely time left to actually demonstrate its workings properly....

here · Post by **Fatleaf** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:31 pm

Rxke wrote:
Cool, but worst.video.evar!

You just sit through a totally uninteresting and pointless timelapse video, and at the end there's barely time left to actually demonstrate its workings properly....

Yeh, I thought that as well. I would hope for a bit of an explanation of the physics behind it but... Alas not to be.

Post by **Disembodied** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:08 pm

The New Scientist site comes with a bit of an explanation:

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/ ... ystal.html

here · Post by **Fatleaf** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:36 pm

Disembodied wrote:
The New Scientist site comes with a bit of an explanation:

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/ ... ystal.html

That is the link in the description of the video on YouTube.

Post by **Disembodied** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:38 pm

Fatleaf wrote:
That is the link in the description of the video on YouTube.

Right enough, so it is!

ClymAngus · Post by **ClymAngus** » Fri Mar 11, 2011 7:31 pm

interesting, so diameter not mass defines the frequency range of the cell? Cool. I would be interested to review the physics.

Oolite Bulletins

This is quite clever.

This is quite clever.

Re: This is quite clever.

Re: This is quite clever.

Re: This is quite clever.

Re: This is quite clever.

Re: This is quite clever.

Re: This is quite clever.