By chance I stumbled across the new subentity definition for the Coriolis in 1.74.2 which uses dictionaries instead of the traditional strings (Dodec and Ico continue to use the old-style subentity definitions).
I noticed a typo for flashers #7 and 12. Their phase should be -1.4, not -1.2.
incorrect flashers in Coriolis shipdata
Moderators: winston, another_commander, Getafix
-
Commander McLane
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 9520
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:08 am
- Location: a Hacker Outpost in a moderately remote area
- Contact:
-
Eric Walch
- Slightly Grand Rear Admiral
- Posts: 5536
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 3:48 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: incorrect flashers in Coriolis shipdata
Verified. I just changed it in trunk.Commander McLane wrote:I noticed a typo for flashers #7 and 12. Their phase should be -1.4, not -1.2.
UPS-Courier & DeepSpacePirates & others at the box and some older versions
-
Commander McLane
- ---- E L I T E ----
- Posts: 9520
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:08 am
- Location: a Hacker Outpost in a moderately remote area
- Contact:
Yes, and only in the vanilla docking bay of a vanilla Coriolis station, where the second and third flasher on each side would flash simultaneously, thereby breaking the "line" of five flashers which lead you into the docking bay. However, it is hard to notice even visually. I just stumbled across it while I examined the shipdata. It seemed an obvious c&p error, and is now corrected for the next version.Switeck wrote:If I understand this correctly... the error won't trigger a message in logger, only visual issues?