Database programming help!
Moderators: winston, another_commander, Cody
-
Eli Santiago
- Poor
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:22 pm
- Location: Mex
Database programming help!
Hi, I was wondering if someone could tell me where to download a real My SQL manual, because the one mysql gives free is a reference one. And I would kindly apreciate any tips on learning.
I'm Always sticked to Lave and Zaonce $$$$
-
Cyberian Tiger
- Average
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:11 am
If you're using *unix and you install postgresql it kindly installs man pages on SQL for you.
Most of which is applicable to mysql.
Alternatively the postgresql documentation is available online, I find it slightly easier to use than the mysql documentation.
Yes I am completely biased in favour of postgresql over mysql
-CT
Most of which is applicable to mysql.
Alternatively the postgresql documentation is available online, I find it slightly easier to use than the mysql documentation.
Yes I am completely biased in favour of postgresql over mysql
-CT
-
Flying_Circus
- Dangerous
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:04 pm
- Location: Hexham, UK
Database programming and admin are best learnt in their context, as well, I'd say. Running aa database as the backend to a website is a very different proposition to running it as a standalone, say, or even in a small network.
So, if, for instance, you mean "I want to leaarn MySQL to program PHP-based websites" (as an example) then a book specifically aimed at that use, such as this Ex-Wrox title, being republished by Apress http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10017 (or even their dediicated e-commerce title), might suit you best. Apress is good, in this regard, actually: I know quite a few of the people Gary Cornell took on when Wrox went belly-up, and even though I only have one of their books in my own collection, ATM, I know that, as a team of people, they're good at producing good, focussed content.
So, if, for instance, you mean "I want to leaarn MySQL to program PHP-based websites" (as an example) then a book specifically aimed at that use, such as this Ex-Wrox title, being republished by Apress http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10017 (or even their dediicated e-commerce title), might suit you best. Apress is good, in this regard, actually: I know quite a few of the people Gary Cornell took on when Wrox went belly-up, and even though I only have one of their books in my own collection, ATM, I know that, as a team of people, they're good at producing good, focussed content.
And so I gave myself to God. There was a pregnant pause before He said "OK"
I'd also like to say that PostgreSQL is a better database than MySQL.
Not only does MySQL allow you to do all sorts of nasty things that a real database won't let you (like use invalid dates) it ends up being incredibly slow if you try to do complex things with it. If you want a toy database then by all means use MySQL, but for a real database you're going to want PostgreSQL instead.
At my work we're currently based on MySQL. Some of the complex queries that our web site uses can take up to 20 seconds to execute when the server is quiet. Run two of those queries at the same time and they'll take about 4 minutes to complete. Run three at the same time and you're looking at 10 minutes. We're transitioning to PostgreSQL right now because of this poor performance with MySQL - the same queries take 4 seconds to execute, 8 if you're doing two at once.
Not only does MySQL allow you to do all sorts of nasty things that a real database won't let you (like use invalid dates) it ends up being incredibly slow if you try to do complex things with it. If you want a toy database then by all means use MySQL, but for a real database you're going to want PostgreSQL instead.
At my work we're currently based on MySQL. Some of the complex queries that our web site uses can take up to 20 seconds to execute when the server is quiet. Run two of those queries at the same time and they'll take about 4 minutes to complete. Run three at the same time and you're looking at 10 minutes. We're transitioning to PostgreSQL right now because of this poor performance with MySQL - the same queries take 4 seconds to execute, 8 if you're doing two at once.
-
Eli Santiago
- Poor
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:22 pm
- Location: Mex
-
Flying_Circus
- Dangerous
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:04 pm
- Location: Hexham, UK
Absolutely. Postgre is a great database - and it is BSD licensed, rather than GPL. The main argument against it and in favour of MySQL (i.e. that the only company commercially involved with its development had gone bankrupt, whereas MySQL AB seem unstoppable) is no longer the case, of course, with strong interest from a number of platform and DB vendors, vesting in Postgres. The other major gripe against it (i.e. that there wasn't a native Windows port) no longer applies, either, of course.
Many of the major arguments traditionally raised against MySQL have also vanished with this year's release of 5.0, of course, but as it has gained features, so too has it slowed down.
Simple installation ppackages for OS X exist for Postgres on Marc Liyanage's website http://www.entropy.ch/home/. He's a really nice bloke, and he runs an active BB on his website, for people learning to use this stuff.
MySQL themselves have an installer for OS X which is as good as you could wish foor.
Just remember to vacuum regularly
.
Many of the major arguments traditionally raised against MySQL have also vanished with this year's release of 5.0, of course, but as it has gained features, so too has it slowed down.
Simple installation ppackages for OS X exist for Postgres on Marc Liyanage's website http://www.entropy.ch/home/. He's a really nice bloke, and he runs an active BB on his website, for people learning to use this stuff.
MySQL themselves have an installer for OS X which is as good as you could wish foor.
Just remember to vacuum regularly
.And so I gave myself to God. There was a pregnant pause before He said "OK"
-
winston
- Pirate
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:21 pm
- Location: Port St. Mary, Isle of Man
- Contact:
Comments on MySQL vs Postgres: it's about choosing the right tool for the right job. Not all databases need to do complex queries, and MySQL is relatively lightweight. Many high traffic sites work just fine with MySQL (Wikipedia, Slashdot etc.) but the data and queries are probably pretty straightforward for those. I wouldn't dismiss MySQL as a "toy database" - it fits some workloads very well.
The nice thing about them being both free open source software you can try both with no cost and no risk and just use the one that suits the task. For a small database, it probably doesn't really matter which one you use, it's probably only going to be important if you have complex queries or higher demands (either in throughput or certain features - I don't think MySQL supports views yet).
The nice thing about them being both free open source software you can try both with no cost and no risk and just use the one that suits the task. For a small database, it probably doesn't really matter which one you use, it's probably only going to be important if you have complex queries or higher demands (either in throughput or certain features - I don't think MySQL supports views yet).