Page 1 of 1
Galactic Navy errors
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:03 pm
by tinker
From todays log -
Code: Select all
[ship.escortSetup.wtf]: Pending escort count for <StationEntity 0xd2aa920>{"NavyCondor" "NavyCondor" ID: 113 position: (-14076.5, 643.735, 40900.7) scanClass: CLASS_NEUTRAL status: STATUS_ACTIVE} is 6, expected 0. This is an internal error, please report it.
[dataCache.willWrite]: About to write data cache.
[dataCache.write.success]: Wrote data cache.
[shipEntity.setupEscorts.escortShipCircularReference]: ----- WARNING: Ship <ShipEntity 0xa1bb0d0>{"Ixian Gunship" ID: 187 position: (-5195.42, -8059.13, 327274) scanClass: CLASS_NEUTRAL status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT} requested escorts, when it is an escort ship itself. Avoiding possible circular reference overflow by ignoring escort setup.
[ship.escortSetup.wtf]: Pending escort count for <StationEntity 0x7f6bcf816230>{"Navy Constitution" "Navy Constitution" ID: 245 position: (76460.1, -25607.8, 798268) scanClass: CLASS_POLICE status: STATUS_ACTIVE} is 5, expected 0. This is an internal error, please report it.
[ship.escortSetup.wtf]: Pending escort count for <StationEntity 0x7f6bdc4d9320>{"NavyCondor" "NavyCondor" ID: 277 position: (-12498.8, 1631.9, 483592) scanClass: CLASS_POLICE status: STATUS_ACTIVE} is 6, expected 0. This is an internal error, please report it.
I get the circular reference warnings a lot but main point is the 'please report it' for internal errors.
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:06 pm
by JensAyton
1.73.4 or trunk?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:23 pm
by tinker
Sorry about that 1.73.4.
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 4:11 pm
by JensAyton
In that case, I think Eric’s fixed it.
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:39 pm
by tinker
It is not fixed in ver. 5.2.2 which is what I have and the latest on the wiki, or there a patch coming in another version?
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:50 pm
by Thargoid
I think he means it's fixed in 1.74 (as in it's an Oolite problem not an OXP one).
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:00 pm
by Eric Walch
tinker wrote:It is not fixed in ver. 5.2.2 which is what I have and the latest on the wiki, or there a patch coming in another version?
None of the ships you mention is from GN. The navy condor is from Condor.oxp and the other ship from Xian_ships.oxp. None gives errors on using trunk with me.
Thargoid wrote:(as in it's an Oolite problem not an OXP one).
Actually both. A clean oxp should not set up circular references in the first place. But hard to catch with a lot of like_ship references. Therefor its a good thing that oolite double checks these things before adding the ships.
The internal error is an other thing, but I haven't seen this report for a long time, so it is probably fixed while working on other related stuff.
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:09 am
by ADCK
anyone got a link to xian_ships.oxp, I can't seem to find that one.
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:30 am
by tinker
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:59 am
by ADCK
Ah of course, then where is 'Navy Constitution' from? It's not from Galactic Navy.
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:48 am
by Eric Walch
ADCK wrote:Ah of course, then where is 'Navy Constitution' from? It's not from Galactic Navy.
That is also a ship of Charlie, like the Condor. Has 274 subentities of which most are flashers. Also very likely to bug with other oxp's because of badly chosen subentity names like: "bridge", "pylons", "nacelles" etc. Any other oxp, using these same general names will starts using each others subentities.
It has been part of the RS package. I have only that version. There the Constitution is also defined as a "hermit-ship" (launched by rock hermits as defence-ship). Strange as it is defined as a carrier with docks itself and probably even bigger than those rocks.