Funniest review of Phantom Menace
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:08 am
It's in seven parts, and you will be glad you don't live next door to the reviewer by the end of the seventh part.
Here is part one.
Here is part one.
Oolite Bulletins
For information and discussion about Oolite.
https://bb.oolite.space/
Funniest review of Phantom Menace
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:37 am
I've been watching thiss 'till I realised I'm about to be late for work!
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:28 am
LOL
ended up watching all his Star Trek movie rewiews too, funny stuff.
ended up watching all his Star Trek movie rewiews too, funny stuff.
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:53 pm
Oooo he's one sick lil puppy! The director I mean not the fake sociopath.
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:52 pm
Ooh man, this stuff is a great time-waster 
(I should be stuffing boxes, moving Saturday, sigh)
(I should be stuffing boxes, moving Saturday, sigh)
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:26 pm
I think I've watched them all except for the Insurrection review, which I'm watching now. The "Yeah, but the Indians didn't have a... " comment had me LOL'ing.
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:42 pm
My favorite was "People call me a murderer even though I've never been caught". 
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:44 pm
time waster, i must watch this
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:08 am
star trek first contact review - pt 2. Absolute Quality!
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:21 pm
It's very cleverly put together. You pass judgement on the critic very quickly, so personality doesn't get in the way of the review. I love the way he cuts off his own rants.
"this film doesn't make any sence".
The presentation package is good but the deconstruction is bordering on the scientific. Create a hypothesis, back it up with observation, draw conclusion based on that observation. If something is ambiguous say so.
The montages and positioning of footage to illistrate plot holes and logic gaps is masterly. This is a very complex, well researched bit of work, wrapped in a disarming style.
My personal favourite. Chickens lead to eggs, eggs lead to omlettes, omlettes lead to fecal urgency.
"this film doesn't make any sence".
The presentation package is good but the deconstruction is bordering on the scientific. Create a hypothesis, back it up with observation, draw conclusion based on that observation. If something is ambiguous say so.
The montages and positioning of footage to illistrate plot holes and logic gaps is masterly. This is a very complex, well researched bit of work, wrapped in a disarming style.
My personal favourite. Chickens lead to eggs, eggs lead to omlettes, omlettes lead to fecal urgency.