Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Discussion and information relevant to creating special missions, new ships, skins etc.

Moderators: another_commander, winston

User avatar
CommonSenseOTB
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 1397
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:42 am
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by CommonSenseOTB »

JazHaz wrote:
<cough> :oops:

Thought I'd check the Wiki one more time. Seems that there was v5.4.3 released in October. Installed that and the Seccom at Maxeedso suddenly decloaked...!

All is working fine now. Signed up for my first Reserve Duty mission (well with this Commander anyway).

:oops:
:o :) I find it amusing that an error by JazHaz using an old version results in Yodeebe posting a comment that sparks an idea in my head that I then post and gets split off into its' own thread.

See my signature, hehe! :lol:
Take an idea from one person and twist or modify it in a different way as a return suggestion so another person can see a part of it that can apply to the oxp they are working on.


CommonSense 'Outside-the-Box' Design Studios Ltd.
WIKI+OXPs
User avatar
Smivs
Retired Assassin
Retired Assassin
Posts: 8408
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Lost in space
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Smivs »

Some of my best ideas were other people's :?
Commander Smivs, the friendliest Gourd this side of Riedquat.
User avatar
JazHaz
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2991
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:07 am
Location: Enfield, Middlesex
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by JazHaz »

CommonSenseOTB wrote:
I find it amusing that an error by JazHaz using an old version results in Yodeebe posting a comment that sparks an idea in my head that I then post and gets split off into its' own thread.
I thought the ideas you had were quite interesting, something I'd like to see developed too. That's why I suggested splitting the thread.
JazHaz

Gimi wrote:
drew wrote:
£4,500 though! :shock: <Faints>
Cheers,
Drew.
Maybe you could start a Kickstarter Campaign to found your £4500 pledge. 8)
Thanks to Gimi, I got an eBook in my inbox tonight (31st May 2014 - Release of Elite Reclamation)!
User avatar
Fatleaf
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 1988
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:11 am
Location: In analysis mode on Phaelon
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Fatleaf »

I found this in a log and thought I should report it,


04:44:38.719 [station.launchShip.failed]: Cancelled launch for a Rogue Frigate with role pirate, as it is too large for the docking port of the Coriolis Station.


Hope it helps.
Find out about the early influences of Fatleaf here. Also his OXP's!
Holds the Ooniversal record for "Thread Necromancy"
m4r35n357
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:00 pm

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by m4r35n357 »

Fatleaf wrote:
I found this in a log and thought I should report it,
04:44:38.719 [station.launchShip.failed]: Cancelled launch for a Rogue Frigate with role pirate, as it is too large for the docking port of the Coriolis Station.
Hope it helps.
Should be fixed in the next release, if I understand Eric's comments correctly, see this thread for history:
https://bb.oolite.space/viewtopic.php?f= ... ue+frigate
User avatar
JazHaz
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2991
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:07 am
Location: Enfield, Middlesex
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by JazHaz »

As per this thread.

Installed the current nightly, 1.76.0.4675, and was testing the new Enhanced Misjump OXP by cim, which works very well.

Got to interstellar space, surrounded by Thargoids and the Navy. Got destroyed as normal! :oops:

Checked my log, found the following errors:

Code: Select all

13:10:08.984 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe5e34c0>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-5778.29, -3755.24, -3478.65) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:10.171 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe5e34c0>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-6008.06, -3670.71, -3482.42) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:12.953 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe5e34c0>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-6619.03, -3541.26, -2988.17) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:14.296 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe5e34c0>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-6664.67, -3619.77, -2482.9) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:16.109 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe5e34c0>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-6322.07, -3850.83, -1918.95) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:16.796 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe165640>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-4878.13, -4620.82, 1960.4) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:18.265 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe5e34c0>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-5825.08, -4105.93, -1379.5) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:19.984 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe5e34c0>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-5412.14, -4290.62, -911.441) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:23.343 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe165640>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-4006.76, -5675.27, 667.237) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:24.843 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe165640>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-3978.61, -5854.47, 364.403) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:25.015 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe165640>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-3974.9, -5877.28, 326.127) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:26.296 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe165640>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-3954.19, -6037.23, 41.8371) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:26.875 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe165640>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-3945.98, -6107.7, -86.8239) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:27.156 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe165640>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-3943.67, -6131.78, -133.282) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
13:10:27.578 [ship.missileLaunch.invalidPosition]: ***** ERROR: The missile_launch_position defines a position (0, 0, -25.5) behind the <ShipEntity 0xe165640>{"Thargoid Battleship" position: (-3940.15, -6168.09, -203.113) scanClass: CLASS_THARGOID status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT}. In future versions such missiles may explode on launch because they have to travel through the ship.
JazHaz

Gimi wrote:
drew wrote:
£4,500 though! :shock: <Faints>
Cheers,
Drew.
Maybe you could start a Kickstarter Campaign to found your £4500 pledge. 8)
Thanks to Gimi, I got an eBook in my inbox tonight (31st May 2014 - Release of Elite Reclamation)!
User avatar
Fatleaf
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 1988
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:11 am
Location: In analysis mode on Phaelon
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Fatleaf »

Have a look at this post. The issue is with Thargorn Threat.
Find out about the early influences of Fatleaf here. Also his OXP's!
Holds the Ooniversal record for "Thread Necromancy"
User avatar
Eric Walch
Slightly Grand Rear Admiral
Slightly Grand Rear Admiral
Posts: 5536
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 3:48 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Eric Walch »

Fatleaf wrote:
Have a look at this post. The issue is with Thargorn Threat.
Its not with Thargorn Threat, but inside GalNavy some values are still wrong, despite all the error logging that should have been noticed during the past 6 months.
User avatar
Ironfist
Commander
Commander
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:16 pm
Location: London

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Ironfist »

The same error is also true for the Thargon Cruiser.

Ironfist
64bit Mint 10 and Win 8 64bit on E8400 at 3.6GHz - ATI HD5750 graphics.
Concentration is the ability to think of absolutely nothing when it is absolutely necessary.
User avatar
Fatleaf
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 1988
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:11 am
Location: In analysis mode on Phaelon
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Fatleaf »

That is weird as I have had Gal Navy for ages and this error has not been in the log. I tend to check regularly and report most I see.
Find out about the early influences of Fatleaf here. Also his OXP's!
Holds the Ooniversal record for "Thread Necromancy"
User avatar
JazHaz
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2991
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:07 am
Location: Enfield, Middlesex
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by JazHaz »

Fatleaf wrote:
That is weird as I have had Gal Navy for ages and this error has not been in the log. I tend to check regularly and report most I see.
Maybe Thargorn Threat and GalNavy has been conflicting, and only TT has been winning over which OXP controls interstellar space? :roll:
JazHaz

Gimi wrote:
drew wrote:
£4,500 though! :shock: <Faints>
Cheers,
Drew.
Maybe you could start a Kickstarter Campaign to found your £4500 pledge. 8)
Thanks to Gimi, I got an eBook in my inbox tonight (31st May 2014 - Release of Elite Reclamation)!
User avatar
Fatleaf
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 1988
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:11 am
Location: In analysis mode on Phaelon
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Fatleaf »

Could be JazHaz.

I have been looking into the shipdata.plist for Galnavy and there are a few entries for thargoids namely: galnav-thargoid, galnav-thargcruiser and galnav-thargbatship. But only one like_ship which is the galnav-thargcruiser with the galnav-thargoid. But no texture for any Thargoid. There is .dat models for them though.

I am a bit confused.
Find out about the early influences of Fatleaf here. Also his OXP's!
Holds the Ooniversal record for "Thread Necromancy"
User avatar
Fatleaf
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 1988
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:11 am
Location: In analysis mode on Phaelon
Contact:

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Fatleaf »

I had a CTD and this is what I found in the log. A Mine sweeper ship was repeating its message over and over and it was when I went to attempt scooping the (now white on the scanner) Qmine that the CTD occurred.

Here is the edited log entry.

Code: Select all

Opening log for Oolite version 1.76 
20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow]: ***** ERROR: AI stack overflow for <ShipEntity 0x17680f28>{"Quirium Cascade Mine"} in dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL -- stack:

  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  31: timebombAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  30: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  29: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  28: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  27: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  26: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  25: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  24: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  23: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  22: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.050 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  21: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  20: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  19: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  18: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  17: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  16: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  15: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  14: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  13: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  12: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  11: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:  10: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   9: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   8: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   7: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   6: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   5: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   4: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   3: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   2: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   1: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
  20:06:16.051 [ai.error.stackOverflow.dump]:   0: dumbAI.plist: GLOBAL
20:06:16.052 [script.error.exception]: ***** EXCEPTION OoliteException: AI stack overflow for <ShipEntity 0x17680f28>{"Quirium Cascade Mine" position: (540.425, 4780.43, 524537) scanClass: CLASS_CARGO status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT} while handling legacy script actions for <AI "navyBattlegroupMineSweeperAI.plist" state FLYING_ESCORT - safeScriptActionOnTarget:>

20:07:29.782 [exception]: ***** Exception during [manageCollisions] in -[PlayerEntity update:] : OoliteException : AI stack overflow for <ShipEntity 0x17680f28>{"Quirium Cascade Mine" position: (-382.765, 5135.34, 525023) scanClass: CLASS_CARGO status: STATUS_IN_FLIGHT} *****
Hope it helps.
Find out about the early influences of Fatleaf here. Also his OXP's!
Holds the Ooniversal record for "Thread Necromancy"
Duggan
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 496
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Duggan »

In the Reserve Leader board as displayed at Se com Stations I note that having flown in some 37 Sorties and exceeding the Pilot Xequati (or some such) who appears on the bottom of said Leader board having flown 32 sorties.

Would I be correct in assuming that it don't matter how many Sorties I fly, I am never going to get on the reserve Leader board?

Thanks in advance.
Flying Python Class Cruiser, Chapter & Verse IV
User avatar
Pleb
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 908
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:23 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Galactic Navy Strikes Back

Post by Pleb »

No its a predetermined list of names and random number of sorties, that sometimes increases. The players sorties are listed below the others, regardless of how many you have.
Desktop PC: CPU: Intel i7-4790K Quad Core 4.4GHz (Turbo-Charged) GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080Ti RAM: 32GB DDR3

Laptop PC: CPU: Intel i5-10300H Quad Core 4.5GHz (Turbo-Charged) GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 RAM: 32GB DDR4
Post Reply