Hi, KZ9999, and first of all welcome to the boards, and of course to this great game!
A manual in PDF certainly isn't a bad idea. Note, however, the various existing manuals, accessible through the wiki (for instance linked from the
FAQs).
And to take your example: explanations on all standard equipment can also be found ready
in the wiki. Some of it is still stubs, and could surely need polishing.
As far as terminology is concerned, I am afraid we won't get complete unification. As you said, things are messed up from the very beginning. Regarding your questions here's my personal view:
KZ9999 wrote:1) Do we travel through witchspace or hyperspace?
Witchspace (see Ahruman's explanation).
KZ9999 wrote:2) The Galatic Cooperative should be abbreviated to GalCo or GalCoop? (GalCop is actually an incorrect abbreviation, grammatically speaking.)
Even if GalCop is actually an incorrect abbreviation, it's the only one frequently used in the context of Oolite. All possible alternative abbreviations are negligible in their use. Just for this reason it is the only one to go for. I see no reason to change something now that is already well-established. Note that it can also denote the Galactic Police.
KZ9999 wrote:3) The Electronic Counter Measure is an E.C.M or a ECM?
I don't care. (And it could also be E.C.M.)
KZ9999 wrote:4) Is the the Galactic Navy, GalCoop Navy, GalNav or even the GalMil?
If you want it in all it's beauty, it's none of these, but
Her Imperial Majesty's Space Navy. And this is canonical, because it's the only way the Navy is addressed
in the game itself (during the two built-in missions you are doing for the Navy). There is of course some confusion about what Empire and which Majesty the term refers to. It can't be the Duvallian empire, because this has only
male lineage. It has to be GalCop's Navy, so this is for some reason its official title. As it is quite long, I think it is safe to assume that there are abbreviations as well. I think 'Galactic Navy' is fine as a short form.
KZ9999 wrote:5) Should we use the terms introduced in Elite Frontiers & FFE for describing our foes? Pirates are called wolves, bounty hunters are sharks. Following that logic: small freighters are mules, large freighter are bulls, escort craft are dolphins, miners are moles, vipers are bloodhounds, etc.
Frontier is not part of Oolite. There are some people here who disregard it completely. Oolite is basically an adaptation of Elite, so I see no need to introduce terminology that was clearly not present in Elite. As Frontier—if it happens at all(!)—happens roughly two generations
after Oolite (see
Selezen's excellent timeline), it seems obvious to me that the words you mention here have been coined after the time of Elite/Oolite.
KZ9999 wrote:6) Which calendar should we adopt? the human scale 33 century one used in the original manual or the 2000000:00:00:00+ date system found in the game.
Whatever is convenient, without being dogmatic. Again, see Selezen's timeline. The modern Galactic Mean Time as it's found in Oolite was established between the time of Elite and the time of Oolite (3134 according to Sel). But it didn't completely replace the old calender, as I understand that Frontier starts 3199, so this sort of calender was still in use then. Probably the Galactic Mean Time vanished together with GalCop?
KZ9999 wrote:As a side note, I think that we should change the way we describe the 8 galaxies. Instead of being called actual galaxies, we should call them Galactic Zones. All 2040 planets of the GalCoop are part of the Milky Way galaxy, but the zones are separated by non member or hostile regions like the Thargoids.
Yes, this is what we all know, but again I don't see why we should change a well-known terminology now to something never used before? Some time after the wormholes were discovered and 'galaxies' 2 to 7 became part of the Far Colonies Network (later GalCop) people began to understand that they weren't in fact distant galaxies, but distant parts of our own galaxy. But at that time the term 'galaxies' had already stuck, and so it does till this day. If you want an alternative term, I suggest you follow Status Quo (which for Oolite is basically what TDW was for Elite) and its sequel Mutabilis. Drew (the author of the novels) has already come up with an alternative terminology there, so there is no need to re-invent the wheel again. He simply says 'charts', which is a term just as fine as 'zones', with the additional advantage that it is established already through the novels.
Hope I didn't step on your feet too heavily. But you asked for feedback, and this is my opinion.
Have fun with working on the manual. But please keep in mind that you are trying to write an introduction into an already well-established—and even quite matured and detailed—cosmos. So you have to work with what is already there, and cannot pretend that you start with a
tabula rasa, and the cosmos will follow you and your terminology. It won't. And a manual rapidly loses its usefulness if the reader can't relate it to the cosmos it is meant to explain.