Page 1 of 1
Oolite @ 1600x1200 is awesome!
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:09 pm
by JohnnyBoy
This week I bought a second-hand monitor from eBay - an Iiyama ProLite E511S, native resolution 1600x1200. It replaced a 15 inch Benq with a 1024x768 resolution.
What a difference! The finer detail given by the bigger monitor allows me to really nail those suckers with a military laser at a distance of 22 or 23 km. I was worried that my Mac Mini's GMA950 would struggle to keep up the screen refresh, but the only stuttering occurs when I climb or dive with a planet that's close by in view.
Do any other Oolite players use a large display?
Right, that's enough talking. I'm off to shoot something!
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:13 pm
by JensAyton
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:51 am
by Wolfwood
Yup, a 22" Samsung 226BW on my desk. Widescreen display, wonderful picture, pretty Oolite!
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:18 am
by DaddyHoggy
Not got a mac (a PC running Ubuntu) - but for some reason the nvidia restricted drivers only offer me a horribly flickering 50Hz at 1600x1200 on my monitor for my FX5900XT even though under XP it works fine at 60Hz at 16x12 - odd.
Not so bad though - I'm still getting about 50-100fps at 1024x768 so I've opted for smoother over clarity!
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:49 pm
by JohnnyBoy
Ahruman, I couldn't detect which size screen you're using from the link that you posted. 'HDTV' - must be big...
Wolfwood wrote:Yup, a 22" Samsung 226BW on my desk. Widescreen display, wonderful picture, pretty Oolite!
If you're running at 1680x1050, you must be enjoying a similar level of detail to me, Wolfwood.
DaddyHoggy wrote:Not so bad though - I'm still getting about 50-100fps at 1024x768 so I've opted for smoother over clarity!
Well I checked my frame rate, and I'm getting a maximum figure of 60fps dropping to about 30 if there's some rapid planet-redrawing to be done.
At this new resolution, I can knock out a SuperCobra at a 22km distance, but a really pleasant surprise was killing a Mamba at 10km when it was pointing straight at me. In the past, I've had trouble accurately hitting such a slender craft. Feels good!
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:09 pm
by JensAyton
JohnnyBoy wrote:Ahruman, I couldn't detect which size screen you're using from the link that you posted. 'HDTV' - must be big...
24" iMac, 1920 × 1200. (But it’s not really the size that counts, it’s the colour consistency. The 20" iMac I have to use at work is horrible in comparison.)
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:50 pm
by JohnnyBoy
Ahruman wrote:24" iMac, 1920 × 1200. (But it’s not really the size that counts, it’s the colour consistency. The 20" iMac I have to use at work is horrible in comparison.)
1920x1200 means that you have a little more width than me, and definitely a better graphics card.
And yes, I've heard that the 20" screen is a disaster if you're not looking at it straight-on.
I'd like to extend my desktop with another 1600x1200 screen, but because the Mini has just the one DVI port, I have had to investigate some clever alternatives...
- ScreenRecycler would allow the Mini to use the monitor connected to my MacBook, if the Mini and MacBook were networked together
- An EVGA UVPlus+ would allow me to connect a second display to one of my Mini's USB ports
Anyway, I'm going completely off topic here....
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:24 am
by nijineko
not really, it's all about seeing with clarity on oolite. ^^
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:19 pm
by JohnnyBoy
JohnnyBoy wrote:I'd like to extend my desktop with another 1600x1200 screen, but because the Mini has just the one DVI port, I have had to investigate some clever alternatives...
- ScreenRecycler would allow the Mini to use the monitor connected to my MacBook, if the Mini and MacBook were networked together
- An EVGA UVPlus+ would allow me to connect a second display to one of my Mini's USB ports
Anyway, I'm going completely off topic here....
Staying off topic, I've now bought the EVGA UV-16 and a Hewlett Packard 20-incher. So after tomorrow's imminent hardware-setup-extravaganza, I'll have a desktop measuring 3200x1200 pixels. Oh
yesss...
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:32 am
by JameSpal
I'm running dual monitors. Main screen is a 22" HP widescreen LCD at 1680x1050, the other is a 17" CRT running at 1024x768 (I call it my In Cabin Entertainment system).
It's nice for surfing the galaxy-wide web or watching classic movies from the 21st century while on those long, dull Milk runs.
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:11 am
by wackyman465
I use a 1920x1200 iMac too - its biiiigg. But how do you get 100 fps on that? Not running every single OXP you could find, like I am?
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:34 pm
by JohnnyBoy
Well, I got it all working nicely together...