Screenshots

General discussion for players of Oolite.

Moderators: another_commander, winston

User avatar
Zieman
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: in maZe

Post by Zieman »

goran wrote:
Don't know how to add specific ship (not ships by role).
Just add an unique role to your ship and then add ships with that role.
...and keep it under lightspeed!

Friendliest Meteor Police that side of Riedquat

[EliteWiki] Far Arm ships
[EliteWiki] Z-ships
[EliteWiki] Baakili Far Trader
[EliteWiki] Tin of SPAM
User avatar
goran
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

Post by goran »

Zieman wrote:
goran wrote:
Don't know how to add specific ship (not ships by role).
Just add an unique role to your ship and then add ships with that role.
Thanks.
Tested and fps drops 2fps per ship added. :)
ovvldc
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 344
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by ovvldc »

My like too. But the vertice count should come down a bit :shock:.

Perhaps a bit of smoothing and spiffy specular map to polish it?

I was also wondering if those many little engines could be simulated by solid cylinders with a strong indent in the end resulting from a normal map. It would be very fake, but it might not be visible from any reasonable distance. It may reduce the vertice count a lot because you do not need the insides of the engine tubes..

Maybe also an idea for other small hollow pipe bits on ships in general?

Best wishes,
Oscar
User avatar
goran
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

Post by goran »

ovvldc wrote:
My like too. But the vertice count should come down a bit :shock:.

Perhaps a bit of smoothing and spiffy specular map to polish it?
Smoothing only ads more vertices, at least in Wings. Specular/normal maps and shading are still rocket science to me. ;)
I managed to more than halve number of polys and vertices but engines doesn't look so good now.

Image Image
ovvldc wrote:
I was also wondering if those many little engines could be simulated by solid cylinders with a strong indent in the end resulting from a normal map. It would be very fake, but it might not be visible from any reasonable distance. It may reduce the vertice count a lot because you do not need the insides of the engine tubes..
I turned those 3d cylinders into curved planes but now oolite doesn't show the hole at the ends, displaying filled cylinder instead. My lack of knowledge is still massive.

As this is a Screenshot thread, I apologize for discussing here.
User avatar
JensAyton
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by JensAyton »

ovvldc wrote:
I was also wondering if those many little engines could be simulated by solid cylinders with a strong indent in the end resulting from a normal map. It would be very fake, but it might not be visible from any reasonable distance.
It would be very visible, but you could reduce this using a parallax map. Conveniently, the standard shader supports a combined normal_and_parallax_map.
goran wrote:
ovvldc wrote:
Perhaps a bit of smoothing and spiffy specular map to polish it?
Smoothing only ads more vertices, at least in Wings.
Smoothing with the smooth key in Oolite only manipulates vertex normals. However, mixing smooth surfaces and hard edges requires the use of smoothing groups, which is a bit of a black art. I can’t actually remember whether you can export them from Wings, but specifying hard edges in Wings should be a starting point. (Select edges in edge mode, choose “Hardness” from the context menu, then “Hard”.) Frame recently came across some problems with the Obj2DatTex tool and smooth groups. Frame?
User avatar
Frame
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 1477
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:32 am
Location: Witchspace

Post by Frame »

Ahruman wrote:
Frame recently came across some problems with the Obj2DatTex tool and smooth groups. Frame?
Yes the way obj2dattex.py works in writing / determining smooth groups for Oolite Dat model files is faulty if..

the OBJ file in question has disorganised groups, meaning that the same group is several places in the obj file.. just representing different normals

this means you have to modify the obj2dattex file..

They way I have done it is to allow for explicit smoothing groups, meaning that you cannot combine the different groups as you normally can..

Which now that I think of it is an impossible thing to do in Oolite... Oolite only accepts explicit smoothing groups not mixed smoothing groups.. (unless that is what the last two tokens are supposed to be used for but never am in obj2dattex.py)

Code: Select all

FACES
128,127,127,	0.00000,1.00000,0.00000,	3,	2,1,0
.........X.....X..
X marks the two "unused" tokens that are allways 127 if we go by the obj2dattex.py script

Any way here is my alteration for the obj2dattex.file.
this allows for 17 explicit smoothing groups..

Backup your own copy..

My Modified Python Script...

Download here

http://www.box.net/shared/g2tsau77ck

or alter your own accordingly

Cheers Frame...

Code: Select all

#!/usr/bin/python

# EXTENSIONS  : "obj" "OBJ"					# Accepted file extentions
# OSTYPES     : "****"						# Accepted file types
# ROLE        : Editor						# Role (Editor, Viewer, None)
# SERVICEMENU : Obj2DatTex/Convert to .dat	# Name of Service menu item

"""
This script takes a Wavefront .obj file
and exports a .dat file containing the same trimesh.

Colour for the faces is set to flat grey (127,127,127)
and surface normals calculated for each triangle.
"""

import sys, string, math

def vertex_reference(n, nv):
	if (n < 0):
		return n + nv
	return n - 1

inputfilenames = sys.argv[1:]
print "converting...this"
print inputfilenames
for inputfilename in inputfilenames:
	outputfilename = inputfilename.lower().replace(".obj", ".dat")
	if (outputfilename == inputfilename):
		outputfilename = outputfilename,append(".1")
	print inputfilename+"->"+outputfilename
	inputfile = open( inputfilename, "r")
	lines = inputfile.read().splitlines(0)
	outputfile = open( outputfilename, "w")
	mode = 'SKIP'
	vertex_lines_out = ['VERTEX\n']
	faces_lines_out = ['FACES\n']
	n_verts = 0
	n_faces = 0
	skips = 0
	vertex=[]
	uv=[]
	face=[]
	texture=[]
	uvForVertex=[]
	uvsForTexture={}
	textureForFace=[]
	uvsForFace=[]
	textureCounter = 0
	interpretTexture = 0
	materials = {}
	max_v = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0]
	min_v = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0]
	# find materials from mtllib
	for line in lines:
		tokens = string.split(line)
		#print "line :"
		#print line
		#print "tokens :"
		#print tokens
		if (tokens != []):
			if (tokens[0] == 'mtllib'):
				path = string.split(inputfilename, '/')
				path[-1] = tokens[1]
				materialfilename = string.join(path,'/')
				print "going to open material library file: %s" % materialfilename
				infile = open( materialfilename, "r")
				mlines = infile.read().splitlines(0)
				newMaterial = 0
				for mline in mlines:
					tokens1 = string.split(mline)
					if (tokens1 != []):
						if (tokens1[0] == 'newmtl'):
							newMaterialName = tokens1[1]
							newMaterial = 1
						if (tokens1[0] == 'map_Kd'):
							if (newMaterial):
								materials[newMaterialName] = tokens1[1]
								print "Material %s -> %s" % (newMaterialName, tokens1[1])
							newMaterial = 0
	#print "materials :"
	#print materials
	# find geometry vertices first
	for line in lines:
		tokens = string.split(line)
		if (tokens != []):
			if (tokens[0] == 'v'):
				n_verts = n_verts + 1
				# negate x value for vertex to allow correct texturing...
				x = -float(tokens[1])
				y = float(tokens[2])
				z = float(tokens[3])
				vertex.append( ( x, y, z) )
				vertex_lines_out.append('%.5f, %.5f, %.5f\n' % ( x, y, z))
				if (x > max_v[0]):
					max_v[0] = x
				if (y > max_v[1]):
					max_v[1] = y
				if (z > max_v[2]):
					max_v[2] = z
				if (x < min_v[0]):
					min_v[0] = x
				if (y < min_v[1]):
					min_v[1] = y
				if (z < min_v[2]):
					min_v[2] = z
	#print "vertex:"
	#print vertex, len(vertex), n_verts
	#print "\n"
	# find texture coordinates next
	for line in lines:
		tokens = string.split(line)
		if (tokens != []):
			if (tokens[0] == 'vt'):
				uv.append( ( float(tokens[1]), 1.0 - float(tokens[2])) )
	#print "uv:"
	#print uv, len(uv), n_verts
	#print "\n"
	# find faces next
	# use red colour to show smoothing groups
	"""
	smoothing_group = 127
	this makes very little sense since the groups in the obj files
	do not come in any organised manner... 
	Frame 20-11-2009 16:27
	"""
	smoothing_group = 127;
	group_token = 0;
	# the following is a better way of organising our smoothing
	smoothing_id = [] ;
	smoothing_group_for_id = [];
	for line in lines:
		tokens = string.split(line)
		if (tokens != []):
			if (tokens[0] == 's'):
				# we check the group number if it's zero this is a non-smoothed group
				group_token = int(tokens[1])
				if (group_token > 0):
				# outcommented as this assumes organised non segmented smoothing
				#	smoothing_group = smoothing_group +1
				#	if (smoothing_group > 255):
				#		smoothing_group = 0										
				# Frame 27-11-2009 12:42
					if(group_token == 1):
						smoothing_group = 127;
					if(group_token == 2):
						smoothing_group = 128;
					if(group_token == 4):
						smoothing_group = 129;
					if(group_token == 8):
						smoothing_group = 130;
					if(group_token == 16):
						smoothing_group = 131;
					if(group_token == 32):
						smoothing_group = 132;
					if(group_token == 64):
						smoothing_group = 133;
					if(group_token == 128):
						smoothing_group = 134;
					if(group_token == 256):
						smoothing_group = 135;
					if(group_token == 512):
						smoothing_group = 136;
					if(group_token == 1024):
						smoothing_group = 137;
					if(group_token == 2048):
						smoothing_group = 138;
					if(group_token == 4096):
						smoothing_group = 139;
					if(group_token == 8192):
						smoothing_group = 140;
					if(group_token == 16384):
						smoothing_group = 141;
					if(group_token == 32768):
						smoothing_group = 142;
					if(group_token == 65536):
						smoothing_group = 143;
					if(group_token == 131072):
						smoothing_group = 144;
				"""
				if you need more than 17 smoothing groups, just continue like above
				only group_token # 18 would be 131072*2 = 262144 and smoothing_group would be Equal to 145
				Frame...
				"""
								
							
						
						
										
			if (tokens[0] == 'usemtl'):
				textureName = tokens[1]
				if (materials.has_key(textureName)):
					textureName = materials[textureName]
				interpretTexture = 1
				texture.append(textureName)
				uvsForTexture[textureName] = n_verts * [[]]
			if (tokens[0] == 'f'):
				#print "line: %s" % line
				while (len(tokens) >=4):
					bits = string.split(tokens[1], '/')
					v1 = vertex_reference(int(bits[0]), n_verts)
					if (bits[1] > ''):
						vt1 = vertex_reference(int(bits[1]), n_verts)
					bits = string.split(tokens[2], '/')
					v2 = vertex_reference(int(bits[0]), n_verts)
					if (bits[1] > ''):
						vt2 = vertex_reference(int(bits[1]), n_verts)
					bits = string.split(tokens[3], '/')
					v3 = vertex_reference(int(bits[0]), n_verts)
					if (bits[1] > ''):
						vt3 = vertex_reference(int(bits[1]), n_verts)
					else:
						interpretTexture = 0
					#print "face (geometry): %d %d %d" % (v1, v2, v3)
					#print "face (textures): %d %d %d\n" % (vt1, vt2, vt3)
					d0 = (vertex[v2][0]-vertex[v1][0], vertex[v2][1]-vertex[v1][1], vertex[v2][2]-vertex[v1][2])
					d1 = (vertex[v3][0]-vertex[v2][0], vertex[v3][1]-vertex[v2][1], vertex[v3][2]-vertex[v2][2])
					xp = (d0[1]*d1[2]-d0[2]*d1[1], d0[2]*d1[0]-d0[0]*d1[2], d0[0]*d1[1]-d0[1]*d1[0])
					det = math.sqrt(xp[0]*xp[0] + xp[1]*xp[1] + xp[2]*xp[2])
					if (det > 0):
						n_faces = n_faces + 1
						#	norm = (xp[0]/det, xp[1]/det, xp[2]/det)
						# negate the normal to allow correct texturing...
						norm = ( -xp[0]/det, -xp[1]/det, -xp[2]/det)
						face.append((v1,v2,v3))
						faces_lines_out.append('%d,127,127,\t%.5f,%.5f,%.5f,\t3,\t%d,%d,%d\n' % (smoothing_group,norm[0],norm[1],norm[2],v1,v2,v3))
						#
						# check if we're in a non-smoothed group - if so keep incrementing the 'red' smoothing_group value...
						#
						if (group_token == 0):
							# smoothing_group = smoothing_group + 1
							if (smoothing_group > 255):
								smoothing_group = 0
						if (interpretTexture):
							textureForFace.append(textureName)
							uvsForTexture[textureName][v1] = uv[vt1]
							uvsForTexture[textureName][v2] = uv[vt2]
							uvsForTexture[textureName][v3] = uv[vt3]
							uvsForFace.append([ uv[vt1], uv[vt2], uv[vt3]])
					tokens = tokens[:2]+tokens[3:]
	# begin final output...
	outputfile.write('// output from Obj2DatTex.py Wavefront text file conversion script\n')
	outputfile.write('// (c) 2005 By Giles Williams\n')
	outputfile.write('// \n')
	outputfile.write('// original file: "%s"\n' % inputfilename)
	outputfile.write('// \n')
	outputfile.write('// model size: %.3f x %.3f x %.3f\n' % ( max_v[0]-min_v[0], max_v[1]-min_v[1], max_v[2]-min_v[2]))
	outputfile.write('// \n')
	outputfile.write('// textures used: %s\n' % uvsForTexture.keys())
	outputfile.write('// \n')
	outputfile.write('NVERTS %d\n' % n_verts)
	outputfile.write('NFACES %d\n' % n_faces)
	outputfile.write('\n')
	outputfile.writelines(vertex_lines_out)
	outputfile.write('\n')
	outputfile.writelines(faces_lines_out)
	outputfile.write('\n')
	# check that we have textures for every vertex...
	okayToWriteTexture = 1
	#print "uvsForTexture :"
	#print uvsForTexture
	#print "uvsForFace :"
	#print uvsForFace
	if (len(textureForFace) != len(face)):
		okayToWriteTexture = 0
	if (len(uvsForFace) != len(face)):
		okayToWriteTexture = 0
	for texture in textureForFace:
		if (texture == ''):
			okayToWriteTexture = 0
	# if we're all clear then write out the texture uv coordinates
	if (okayToWriteTexture):
		outputfile.write('TEXTURES\n')
		for i in range(0, len(face)):
			facet = face[i]
			texture = textureForFace[i]
			uvForVertex = uvsForTexture[texture]
			
			# outputfile.write('%s\t1.0 1.0\t%.5f %.5f\t%.5f %.5f\t%.5f %.5f\n' % (texture, uvsForFace[i][0][0], uvsForFace[i][0][1], uvsForFace[i][1][0], uvsForFace[i][1][1], uvsForFace[i][2][0], uvsForFace[i][2][1]))
			mmod = 1
			mdi= 1
			mmdi = 1
			outputfile.write('%s\t %.5f %.5f\t%.5f %.5f\t%.5f %.5f\t%.5f %.5f\n' % (texture, mmod, mmod, (uvsForFace[i][0][0]*mmdi), (uvsForFace[i][0][1]*mmdi), (uvsForFace[i][1][0]*mmdi), (uvsForFace[i][1][1]*mmdi), (uvsForFace[i][2][0]*mmdi), (uvsForFace[i][2][1]*mmdi)))
	outputfile.write('\n')
	outputfile.write('END\n')
	outputfile.close();
print "done"
print ""
#
#	end
#
Bounty Scanner
Number 935
User avatar
Griff
Oolite 2 Art Director
Oolite 2 Art Director
Posts: 2478
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: Probably hugging his Air Fryer

Post by Griff »

Image
shaders on Ahrumans new test planet object - this is just me mucking about not a preview of anything in the pipeline for Oolite's future just in case any devs get a heart attack, you can just about see them switching the street lights on in S America - the textures here are really low rez, 512px x 256px maps wrapped around a whole world and the normal map may actually be inside out - do the continents lower than the sea to any one else as well?
Last edited by Griff on Fri Nov 27, 2009 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
OneoftheLost
Deadly
Deadly
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:30 pm

Post by OneoftheLost »

:(

Its so purty...
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8501
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Post by DaddyHoggy »

:shock: 8) :D OMG!
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
JensAyton
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by JensAyton »

Frame wrote:
(unless that is what the last two tokens are supposed to be used for but never am in obj2dattex.py)
The unused values really are unused. Originally the three first values for a face were its colour, but that isn’t used at all now.
User avatar
Killer Wolf
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:38 pm

Post by Killer Wolf »

that looks cracking Griff. the lower ones DO look recessed to me, but it's not like it ruins the effect.
how's the shader work w/ the planet rotation then, do you only see the lights when that side's in shadow?
User avatar
Kaks
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 3009
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Big Smoke

Post by Kaks »

Drool!

Griff, any chance of packaging that planet in a griff-earth oxp? I'd love to have a look at that in-game! :)
Hey, free OXPs: farsun v1.05 & tty v0.5! :0)
User avatar
JensAyton
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by JensAyton »

Griff wrote:
shaders on Ahrumans new test planet object - this is just me mucking about not a preview of anything in the pipeline for Oolite's future just in case any devs get a heart attack, you can just about see them switching the street lights on in S America - the textures here are really low rez, 512px x 256px maps wrapped around a whole world and the normal map may actually be inside out - do the continents lower than the sea to any one else as well?
I think the east/west component of the normal map is OK, but the north/south component needs to be inverted.
User avatar
Griff
Oolite 2 Art Director
Oolite 2 Art Director
Posts: 2478
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: Probably hugging his Air Fryer

Post by Griff »

Kaks wrote:
Drool!

Griff, any chance of packaging that planet in a griff-earth oxp? I'd love to have a look at that in-game! :)
yes of course, it's here
http://www.box.net/shared/aapxtxx5a0
another_commander
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 6557
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:54 am

Post by another_commander »

*Checks out Griff's planet in-game*

*Faints*
Image Image Image
Post Reply