Page 1 of 2

Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:54 am
by Cody
... of the very latest USN destroyer!

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:10 am
by Commander_X
Looks like the Vulcans are here already 8) That's what the shape of that ship tells me!

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2015 4:15 am
by Wildeblood
When land lubbers write about ships...
The largest and most futuristic destroyer has set sail. And at its head is Captain James Kirk.
Oh dear.

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:10 am
by ocz
My first thought of the first picture of that article was, 'Wow! That's some really bad CGI.'

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:48 am
by spud42
set sail? i didnt see a mast or sails ????

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:20 am
by Smivs
spud42 wrote:
set sail? i didnt see a mast or sails ????
Well, it is very high-tech - it probably has graphene nano-sails.

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:48 am
by ocz
My bet is, they create a forcefield around the ship and use its drag instead of cloth sails.

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:12 am
by NigelJK
Thought it looked familiar.
Image

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:13 pm
by ClymAngus
I read that it's fundamentally unstable in the water and needs computer control to keep it upright. I see a flaw there right away.

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:22 pm
by Wildeblood
ClymAngus wrote:
I read that it's fundamentally unstable in the water and needs computer control to keep it upright. I see a flaw there right away.
One reason for that being the large sail area, because they've got the mast enclosed in a box.

Righto, let's not mince words here; the Zumwalt is as ugly as sin. Co-incidentally, also just last week, the RAN commissioned their latest ship, so I get to say, "That's not a warship, this is a warship..."

Image

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:56 pm
by Cody
ClymAngus wrote:
I read that it's fundamentally unstable in the water and needs computer control to keep it upright. I see a flaw there right away.
Kinda like a nautical equivalent of fly-by-wire? <grins> Talking of flying, the BUFF has now been in service for sixty years!

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:50 pm
by ocz
Well, an unstable airodynamic form is a wanted feature in fighter aircrafts. Even if a human pilot on her/himself could never control it without computer assistance, it gives the craft a higher manueribility, a more stable form could never provide. But I do fail to the the logic behind it in a destroyer class ship. Maybe a flaw in the disign? :roll: But the engeneers didn't gave up, even if it came with a certain price? What ever.

If they wanted a destroyer with a small radar profile, cound't they just have build a hybrid between a destoyer and a submarine? Its maindeck just above and in stealth mode just below the water surface.

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:56 pm
by Cody
Is it possible that the Zumwalt-Class Destroyer indeed is submersible and can dive like a dolphin, and that this capability is simply classified?

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:41 pm
by ClymAngus
Guess we'll find out as soon as it sails into a storm.

Oh here's that article:
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defens ... /76728838/

Maybe they'll Bermuda Triangle it, maybe they won't. Nothing "disappears" a ship quicker and without an S.O.S. quite like a capsize.

Re: Captain James Kirk in command...

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 1:01 pm
by Cody
ClymAngus wrote:
Nothing "disappears" a ship quicker and without an S.O.S. quite like a capsize.
'Twas a dirty night, 'twas a dirty trick... when our ship turned over in the Atlantic!