ID Computer

General discussion for players of Oolite.

Moderators: another_commander, winston

Should Oolite have an Ident computer like some other versions of Elite?

Yes, you should always have it right from the start.
3
15%
Yes, but it should be an additional piece of equipment to buy.
10
50%
No, the missile targetting system works fine already.
1
5%
No, lets just enhance what is already in place.
6
30%
 
Total votes: 20

User avatar
aegidian
Master and Commander
Master and Commander
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Meta...

Post by aegidian »

Darkbee wrote:
Am I sounding very bossy right now? (apologies if I am, I realise its not my project...honest!)
Don't worry, if I get too overwhelmed with feature requests I just go and do what I want to do anyway. 8)

This may change once I have Subversion up and running (server upgrade and a book to read first) and can start inviting more active co-development. :wink:
"The planet Rear is scourged by well-intentioned OXZs."

Oolite models and gear? click here!
User avatar
aegidian
Master and Commander
Master and Commander
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Post by aegidian »

Okay, v1.26 has implementations of some of these suggestions. Further comments on how I implemented them and suggestions for how they may be improved, please...
"The planet Rear is scourged by well-intentioned OXZs."

Oolite models and gear? click here!
User avatar
jonnycuba
Deadly
Deadly
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Witchspace

Post by jonnycuba »

Just played with 1.26. Blasted off to an anarchy system & had a go with the enhanced scanner/multi misslie (although I'm confused as I purchased one item & had both multi missiles & enhanced scanner, is this right :?: ). Anyway I rarely use missiles but this enhancement was good fun to use. Oolite is becoming an awesome game, since 1.22 I don't think I've played a better version of Elite, infact it really is starting to move into a class of it's own truely 'Oolite'! :D
Team Zorg are Go!
User avatar
Darkbee
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:40 pm
Location: Space... man!
Contact:

Post by Darkbee »

The ID computer really seems superfluous to requirements... why would I ever want to use it?

If missles are now automatically locked on when you have an ID target... then why not just lock a missile on, in the first place? (which will still tell you what you're locked onto anyway). Not withstanding the fact if you have the scanner enhancement that will ALSO tell you what ship you've locked onto. So my question is, how does the ID computer help, or add anything to the gameplay? I vaguely remember reading that, locking onto ships with missiles should be considered an act of aggression, which could be used to explain why you can't just lock missiles on ships, willy nilly, to find out what they are.

I would suggest that if you want to keep the ID computer, then if you lock onto a ship WITHOUT using it (i.e. directly with a missile, using T), then you should not be told what target you've locked onto (i.e. the "missile locked onto poor defenceless anaconda" should be removed or made generic). Furthermore, using the direct missile lock method, could or should risk the possibility of the ship becoming hostile.

The only time I could think of that an ID computer would be useful (and we assume that the missiles have their own targetting capability) is if you have run out of missiles. Even then, can I not still use the T key in combination with my scanner enhancement to identify ships? (even if I can't actually fire a missile on them)

I like what you've done but it does seem a bit clumsy at the moment. I have not played with it extensively yet but I just wanted to brainstorm on the forum. No doubt I'll return with some more ideas once I get a chance to play it a bit more.

I have some questions but it'll probably be better if I figure out the answers myself... one that springs to mind is, if you have targetted multiple ships and locked on with missiles... can you still cycle through the locked missiles and thus change the target that shows up on the scanner enhancment?
Last edited by Darkbee on Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
aegidian
Master and Commander
Master and Commander
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Post by aegidian »

Darkbee wrote:
if you have targetted multiple ships and locked on with missiles... can you still cycle through the locked missiles and thus change the target that shows up on the scanner enhancment?
Yes.
"The planet Rear is scourged by well-intentioned OXZs."

Oolite models and gear? click here!
User avatar
Murgh
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 6:19 am
Location: Terra Firma

Post by Murgh »

I don't think the IDcom is superfluous. it's certainly your last tool once you've spent your missiles and you appreciate the directional help given by a "lock", but even with a full hand of missiles I prefer peacefully IDing ships first.

if every ship I lock missiles onto is given an alert and sees its status go red, some should definately become aggressive. no less so the police. what cop ever just shrugged off being pointed a gun at?

since Giles is looking into sophisticating this AI beviour, maybe there'll be a shift to a more diplomatically sensitive era. :shock:

maybe (blahblah) only the IDcom should have the distance, name and status, and while Missile Lock just concentrate on the frame and arrow, and distance, to easier see what modus you're in. or it's fine as it is. :D
User avatar
jh145
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2014 8:39 pm

Re: ID Computer

Post by jh145 »

It gets so busy in the space-lanes sometimes that it can be hard to remember what, on your busy scanner, you have actually identified. So, proposal for further enhancement: how about an option to mark as "unidentified" anything on the scanner that your STE has not already told you about, for example by having all the un-id'd little yellow sticks flash slowly.
another_commander
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 6552
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:54 am

Re: ID Computer

Post by another_commander »

Image

11 years. We have a definitive new winner.
User avatar
Smivs
Retired Assassin
Retired Assassin
Posts: 8408
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Lost in space
Contact:

Re: ID Computer

Post by Smivs »

***Applause***
Commander Smivs, the friendliest Gourd this side of Riedquat.
User avatar
Cody
Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
Sharp Shooter Spam Assassin
Posts: 16059
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:31 pm
Location: The Lizard's Claw
Contact:

Re: ID Computer

Post by Cody »

<chortles> Leafy will be disappointed to lose his title!
I would advise stilts for the quagmires, and camels for the snowy hills
And any survivors, their debts I will certainly pay. There's always a way!
User avatar
Norby
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: Budapest, Hungary (Mainly Agricultural Democracy, TL10)
Contact:

Re: ID Computer

Post by Norby »

jh145 wrote:
having all the un-id'd little yellow sticks flash slowly.
This approach assume that your scanner can get info from your front only. Not so hard to make an OXP which turn on the standard alternating stick color in this case, for example yellow-orange.

Personally I think the identification is possible from any direction within range, so my MFD in Telescope show the type of nearby targets, this save the locking of them.

Edit: typo fix in url.
Last edited by Norby on Mon May 11, 2015 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Wildeblood
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2286
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 6:07 am
Location: Western Australia

Re: ID Computer

Post by Wildeblood »

another_commander wrote:
We have a definitive new winner.
Never mind that; has that poll been running for more than 10 years? And only 15 people voted...
User avatar
jh145
Dangerous
Dangerous
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2014 8:39 pm

Re: ID Computer

Post by jh145 »

Norby wrote:
... so my MFD in Telescope show the type of nearby targets, this save the locking of them.
Oooh, nice piece of kit. Must install ... thanks!
User avatar
Diziet Sma
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 6311
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:20 pm
Location: Aboard the Pitviper S.E. "Blackwidow"

Re: ID Computer

Post by Diziet Sma »

Wildeblood wrote:
Never mind that; has that poll been running for more than 10 years? And only 15 people voted...
In fairness, that was probably 75% of the forum membership, at the time.. :wink:
Most games have some sort of paddling-pool-and-water-wings beginning to ease you in: Oolite takes the rather more Darwinian approach of heaving you straight into the ocean, often with a brick or two in your pockets for luck. ~ Disembodied
User avatar
Alex
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Oz. The land of some gold but mostly rust

Re: ID Computer

Post by Alex »

I think the current version 1.80 has all the ID equipment needed already available. Having all visible ships Id'd on the hud at same time would be very messy and distracting.
LOOK OUT!!!
OOPS..
"Press Space" Commander
If you do not see "Press Space" more often than you want.. Your not trying!
Post Reply