Paradox wrote:The question is, when your cross-hairs signal target lock (or even the sniperlock oxp), is it indicating a direct line along the line of sight from your view point, or the lasers line of sight (which can vary greatly on some ships)? Am I making sense? };]
Yes, you're making sense (to me, at least)..
But your use of terminology is causing considerable confusion, both to yourself and others..(see below for explanation)
As has been mentioned, if you want to see some extreme parallax in action, the
Falcon is your baby.. Here's a screenshot taken from my Falcon-S.. according to the red target reticle, I have a lock, although the metal fragment is well to the left of the crosshairs on the centre-line, where the laser beam is firing, and missing.. so clearly the reticle is indicating the
pilot's line-of-sight, and not the laser's. The degree of compensation needs to be guess-timated.. with distance to target as a factor.
Paradox wrote:Commander McLane wrote:It is B. And it has never been anything else but B since Oolite existed.
So, according to you, when my
laser barrel is on a direct line of sight with the target, that is when the cross-hairs signal a target lock... Then why does it miss?? And why then would accuracy diminish the further the laser is from the pilots point of view?
The above well illustrates the confusion of both yourself and Commander Mclane.. You are each talking about something completely different.
This is the root of the confusion:
Paradox wrote:How do my cross-hairs know when to turn red?
You keep using the expression "crosshairs signalling a target lock" or "crosshairs turning red". The crosshairs
do not "turn red". In fact, they do not "signal" anything. What you are referring to is the
Target Reticle turning red, to indicate a target lock.
Commander McLane is
correct when he states that the
crosshairs indicate a direct/straight line drawn from the
weapon_position_forward
to a point directly forward of the laser barrel. As you can see in the screenshot, the laser strikes the
exact center of the crosshairs (those
green Y-shaped things and the circle in the middle of the screen).
But your question is not actually about the crosshairs at all. If, instead of "crosshairs", you had used the term
targeting reticle, Commander McLane would have answered "A", since, as can be seen in the above screenshot, it's very clear that the colour-change 'signal' of the targeting reticle indicates a direct/straight line from the pilot's
view_position_forward
to the center of the target.
Clear as mud?
(As you can see, correct use of terminology is quite important, particularly in view of the many board members we have, -McLane included- for whom English is not their primary language, and who therefore tend to take what is said quite literally)
The target reticle turning red is still useful at distance, but at close range, you need to ignore the green/red signalling of the reticle and concentrate on getting the target into the crosshairs instead.
Paradox wrote:I am pretty sure that even current targeting systems are intelligent enough to signal when the weapon itself is on target, and not just the point of view of the pilot...?
On this point, I completely agree with you. I would like to see the colour-change of the reticle linked to the weapon line-of-sight, instead of the pilot's line-of-sight.