March 15th
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:18 am
It's the IDEs of March!
Happy IDEs of March, everyone.
Sorry, had to get that one out there.
Happy IDEs of March, everyone.
Sorry, had to get that one out there.
Why not? He deserved to be murdered.Rxke wrote:Okay I did some wekipedi-ing.
You guys actually celebrate Julius C's death ?
So a through and through politician then? Thatcher, anyone?SandJ wrote:He was an evil, selfish, scheming, lying, untrustworthy, callous, man who should have been dealt with at the age of 16 as originally intended.
Sadly, he understood how to use the cult of personality and so he is assumed to be some sort of hero. He was a shit.
Oh, I did get the IDE thing, but as a non-native speaker, that 15th of March flew over my head.Selezen wrote:
We don't celebrate it (unless we do, and nobody told me ) ... but "beware the Ides of March" is one of those little bits from Shakespeare that people tend to remember, along with the fact that the Ides of March fell on the 15.Rxke wrote:You peeps celebrate that because of Shakespeare, who made it semi-popular in your culture.
I guess you peeps hate(d) him more than Belgians (we have other historical enemy-figures far worse than Julius C...)
We don't celebrate it at all; I was just trying to be funny.Rxke wrote:You peeps celebrate that because of Shakespeare, who made it semi-popular in your culture.
I guess you peeps hate(d) him more than Belgians (we have other historical enemy-figures far worse than Julius C...)
Yes, a mixture of primate alpha-male tendencies and confirmation bias. I always liked Enrico Fermi's comment about "great generals":SandJ wrote:I think Julius Caesar is held up as an interesting historical figure who is generally considered A Good Bloke by those who know little about him, and as a great general and statesman by those who know a bit more. One of those who comes under the heading of "Never mind what he was like as a man, look at what he achieved, so that makes everything OK".
I just find it a bit heart-breaking that even in these supposedly enlightened times, people can still start wars that kill 100,000s of innocent civilians and be held up as Good People for doing so. It seems to be something hard-wired into the human psyche to make social cohesion work.
(quote taken from the paper "Theory of aces: high score by skill or luck?", available here:During the “Manhattan project” (the making of nuclear bomb), physicist Enrico Fermi asked General Leslie Groves, the head of the project, what is the definition of a “great” general. Groves replied that any general who had won five battles in a row might safely be called great. Fermi then asked how many generals are great. Groves said about three out of every hundred. Fermi conjectured that if the chance of winning one battle is 1/2 then the chance of winning five battles in a row is 1/2^5 = 1/32. “So you are right, General, about three out of every hundred. Mathematical probability, not genius.”
Now that is pretty great, imagine Fermi saying that to Groves, esp. in that time and place...Disembodied wrote:(quote taken from the paper "Theory of aces: high score by skill or luck?", available here:you are right, General, about three out of every hundred. Mathematical probability, not genius.”
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0607109.pdf )
A nicely-written paper, with some unpleasant implications:Disembodied wrote:(quote taken from the paper "Theory of aces: high score by skill or luck?", available here:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0607109.pdf )