Page 1 of 1

Apple v Samsung :¬(

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:46 pm
by DaddyHoggy
I'm getting pretty fed-up of this kind of stuff now.

http://www.reghardware.com/2011/08/10/s ... injuction/

I saw the Galaxy Tab 10 when I was in the US, I really liked it - I didn't have the cash, so I couldn't buy one.

However, this kind of behaviour isn't going to persuade me to buy an iPad (ever), that's for certain.

Re: Apple v Samsung :¬(

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:10 pm
by drew
Ticked off as well. Do you think Apple will sue me too?

Image

Hey, it's got what the Samsungs got... Round edges, a black border and tiled icons after all. Mines thinner though and the battery life kicks the iPad into next week. Stop abusing your monopoly Mr. Jobs!

:shock: 8) :lol:

Cheers,

Drew.

Re: Apple v Samsung :¬(

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:12 pm
by DaddyHoggy
Surely, to be almost grammatically correct and ironic at the same time it should be called the "iDrewPad"

I love the design - I'm calling Apple though - clear infringement of something.

Re: Apple v Samsung :¬(

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:59 am
by Makandal
I am totally shocked by Drew's clear attempt to copy a patented technology. I think his next step will be to open iDrewShop and open an iDrewStore with iDrewApps.
This is scandalous.

Re: Apple v Samsung :¬(

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 4:03 pm
by DaddyHoggy
Image

Introducing the BMAPAD (Bloody Marvellous Access*)

Featuring the new flip-side "INFI-SPACE"(TM) Tech, for infinite** storage capacity

Compatible with both the DrewPad and the DTPAD

* DH-Technologies deny the claim that this originally stood for Bite Me Apple.

**Storage levels calculated locally per machine, DH-Technologies cannot be held responsible if local user cannot write infinitely small to make maximum usage of provided storage capacity