<div class="image-container">
<div class="image-frame">
<a href="gallery/full/coriolis.jpg">
<img src="gallery/thumb/coriolis.png" alt="Coriolis">
</a>
</div>
<div class="image-caption">
The Coriolis, the most common type of space station.
</div>
</div>
Should be nearly self-explanatory. Only thing you probably need to know is that the preview-image should be 200x160, otherwise some of it will be cut.
the arrows at the bottom wouldn't have a function most users should already be familiar with scroll bars, though, so no worries
I think many would prefer to not have all the pictures on one page, especially those with mobile or otherwise limited connections.
Yours displays 12 pictures, that's just one picture less than all pictures that are displayed now.
But you're right, if they become more, it'd be better to spread them to some more pages.
Ok.. NOW I understand why I've been seeing so much traffic from Russia on my alt download site.. nice looking site.
Back on topic..
Wow.. lots of things happening since I last checked in here.. I'm glad to see the oolite.org site will get a makeover. Keep up the good work everyone!
Most games have some sort of paddling-pool-and-water-wings beginning to ease you in: Oolite takes the rather more Darwinian approach of heaving you straight into the ocean, often with a brick or two in your pockets for luck. ~ Disembodied
Ok.. NOW I understand why I've been seeing so much traffic from Russia on my alt download site.. nice looking site.
You’re confusing cause and effect there. :-) Oolite’s had high interest from Russia for quite some time, for whatever reason.
Russia is the #4 source country for oolite.org traffic, accounting for 5.7% of total traffic since it went online. The top three are UK (25.1%), US (18.7%), and Germany (12.1%).
<div class="image-container">
<div class="image-frame">
<a href="gallery/full/coriolis.jpg">
<img src="gallery/thumb/coriolis.png" alt="Coriolis">
</a>
</div>
<div class="image-caption">
The Coriolis, the most common type of space station.
</div>
</div>
Should be nearly self-explanatory. Only thing you probably need to know is that the preview-image should be 200x160, otherwise some of it will be cut.
Yeah pretty straightforward.
Why don't you use the width and height tags to scale the preview image to 200x160 though?
JazHaz
Gimi wrote:
drew wrote:
£4,500 though! <Faints>
Cheers,
Drew.
Maybe you could start a Kickstarter Campaign to found your £4500 pledge.
Thanks to Gimi, I got an eBook in my inbox tonight (31st May 2014 - Release of Elite Reclamation)!
If you use the latest version of the Google Toolbar, that now comes with a good translation utility which can translate Russian to English pretty well. On the fly too (well within a few seconds).
This makes Roolite a nice resource on top of Wiki and the BBS!
Last edited by JazHaz on Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JazHaz
Gimi wrote:
drew wrote:
£4,500 though! <Faints>
Cheers,
Drew.
Maybe you could start a Kickstarter Campaign to found your £4500 pledge.
Thanks to Gimi, I got an eBook in my inbox tonight (31st May 2014 - Release of Elite Reclamation)!
Why don't you use the width and height tags to scale the preview image to 200x160 though?
Because if you have to make a thumbnail anyway, you can as well scale it right
Letting html scale it would mean that you either have pixelated pictures or use more bandwith that you actually need.
Why don't you use the width and height tags to scale the preview image to 200x160 though?
Because if you have to make a thumbnail anyway, you can as well scale it right
Letting html scale it would mean that you either have pixelated pictures or use more bandwith that you actually need.
But it would avoid losing bits!
JazHaz
Gimi wrote:
drew wrote:
£4,500 though! <Faints>
Cheers,
Drew.
Maybe you could start a Kickstarter Campaign to found your £4500 pledge.
Thanks to Gimi, I got an eBook in my inbox tonight (31st May 2014 - Release of Elite Reclamation)!
Why don't you use the width and height tags to scale the preview image to 200x160 though?
Because if you have to make a thumbnail anyway, you can as well scale it right :D
Letting html scale it would mean that you either have pixelated pictures or use more bandwith that you actually need.
Specifying the dimensions (without in-browser scaling) has the advantage that the browser can lay out the page properly before the image loads. Whether it will depends on the browser, other aspects of the page structure, and how fast it’s getting the images.
Specifying the dimensions (without in-browser scaling) has the advantage that the browser can lay out the page properly before the image loads. Whether it will depends on the browser, other aspects of the page structure, and how fast it’s getting the images.
Thats true! Probably worth adding the width and height tags anyway then.
JazHaz
Gimi wrote:
drew wrote:
£4,500 though! <Faints>
Cheers,
Drew.
Maybe you could start a Kickstarter Campaign to found your £4500 pledge.
Thanks to Gimi, I got an eBook in my inbox tonight (31st May 2014 - Release of Elite Reclamation)!
Specifying the dimensions (without in-browser scaling) has the advantage that the browser can lay out the page properly before the image loads. Whether it will depends on the browser, other aspects of the page structure, and how fast it’s getting the images.
The image container has already fixed width (via CSS). I have no connection slow enough to test that, but shouldn't the layout load properly before the image this way, too?
I think it will resize if you put an image that is too large in it.
Not if you use overflow: hidden;. That's why the images will be cropped automatically with my CSS-file.
Just some precaution to not screw up the layout, although I don't really expect people who have access to the Oolite website to accidentally put in too large images.