Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:45 pm
Oops, yes, you're right..Ahruman wrote:Um… Katla’s eruptions have been several orders of magnitude short of superanythingness.
Merely piddly little Mt. St. Helens-scale stuff.

For information and discussion about Oolite.
https://bb.oolite.space/
Oops, yes, you're right..Ahruman wrote:Um… Katla’s eruptions have been several orders of magnitude short of superanythingness.
Merely piddly little Mt. St. Helens-scale stuff.
There's an old* story (the veracity of which I cannot in any way confirm) that tells the tale of how the Chinese improved the safety for air travelers. After being plagued by several nasty crashes, they simply put it into law that any airline executive above a certain level had to regularly fly in one of their own planes. Problem solved.DaddyHoggy wrote:So far the KLM and Lufthansa flights have deliberately flown into the breaks in the ash cloud or beneath it, to prove that if they're not in it - their aircraft aren't in any danger - hmmm....
A BA 747 has just landed back at Cardiff having flown a big loop, up through and then back down through the cloud, it's been whisked off to the BA hanger for a strip down. They made a big thing about the BA Chairman Willy Walsh being on it - so what - now if he'd put just his family on the plane - then I would have believed that he was sure there was no danger.
I'm not really sure whether you can upgrade air filters in a way to deal with the amount of ashes you're going to encounter on the flight.Micha wrote:Get a standard prop-plane (although you'd probably want upgraded air filters) and it ought to be fine.
Uhm… you realise we’re not talking about a very dense cloud once you’re 100 km from Iceland, right? Even if it did cling to an airship in surprising amounts, the process would – at the very worst – bring it down slowly.Sarin wrote:sticky ash would probably stick to the airship's hull, and bring it down with its weight.
Oaw man! I've got a nest of people on the brassgoogles forum (steampunk) who have gone into this in fine detail. It comes down to; does plankton cling to a sub hull? No. Same principle less animate.Ahruman wrote:Uhm… you realise we’re not talking about a very dense cloud once you’re 100 km from Iceland, right? Even if it did cling to an airship in surprising amounts, the process would – at the very worst – bring it down slowly.Sarin wrote:sticky ash would probably stick to the airship's hull, and bring it down with its weight.
I could imagine static electricity becoming relevant in the case of a zeppelin flying though a cloud of small glass balls. :-) Anywho, I’ve heard and read a number of people who’ve done actual research saying volcanic ash is not believed to be a problem for piston engines, so we probably only need to revert to 1940s technology.ClymAngus wrote:Oaw man! I've got a nest of people on the brassgoogles forum (steampunk) who have gone into this in fine detail. It comes down to; does plankton cling to a sub hull? No. Same principle less animate.
FEAR MY LIGHTNING ZEPPELIN OF DOOM!Cmdr James wrote:Dont give the steampunks any ideas