My ideas about jet fuel are, I admit, based on the movies; however, it still isn't exactly inert. And we shouldn't forget that present-day safety standards are a product of a WEIRD society - Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic. Other societies have different tolerances; it wasn't that long ago that the seas were full of ships, made of tarry rope, canvas, and wood, with all artificial lighting provided by (at best) lanterns, and all cooking carried out on open fires. And the ships often carried tonnes of gunpowder. Even when the ships weren't full of explosives, people would still willingly* sign up to voyages where you had a one in three chance of dying.RockDoctor wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:29 pmOh, have you been watching Hollywood again? Hint : dramatic, not realistic. Besides, they like to mix their fuel tanks with explosions, which produces clouds of fine droplets which are a specific different kind of fire. Hint _ we keep the explosives bunker very literally at the opposite end of the site to the Aviation Fuel bunker - when we can't keep the "bang" off-site altogether.
EDIT : all you ever wanted to know about Jet-A(1) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel
*For a given value of "willingly". The only other option was often "starvation".