Page 298 of 330

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:32 pm
by JensAyton
Other than the occasional profile link potentially propping up some ill-gotten PageRank™, I don’t think old spammer accounts are anything to worry about. The main benefit of cleaning out ones that don’t post anything is that they keep the place looking fresh and clean and unzombified – a sort of “broken window effect” deterrent. Having a small number of missed cases in the depths of the roster isn’t going to affect anything in that regard.

(Note that the original purpose of this thread was to report spam posts. Today, the second-line defence of first-post verification seems nearly 100 % effective. I think throwing out link farmers is worthwhile too, but going through 2500 existing users is way past the point of diminishing returns.)

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:37 pm
by Tricky
Ignore my sig links. Not a link farmer. :mrgreen:

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:18 pm
by Commander McLane
Ahruman wrote:
Other than the occasional profile link potentially propping up some ill-gotten PageRank™, I don’t think old spammer accounts are anything to worry about. The main benefit of cleaning out ones that don’t post anything is that they keep the place looking fresh and clean and unzombified – a sort of “broken window effect” deterrent. Having a small number of missed cases in the depths of the roster isn’t going to affect anything in that regard.

(Note that the original purpose of this thread was to report spam posts. Today, the second-line defence of first-post verification seems nearly 100 % effective. I think throwing out link farmers is worthwhile too, but going through 2500 existing users is way past the point of diminishing returns.)
Also, many of these old members who appear to have zero posts actually do have a lot of posts on their names. It's just that their posts either fell off the board's auto-delete-threads-after-this-and-that-amount-of-time-function when it was still active (no worries, it isn't any longer), or were lost in the board-hacking-and-subsequent-restoration of New Year's Eve 2010/11. And it wouldn't be a nice and friendly gesture to delete retired legitimate board members.

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:21 pm
by DaddyHoggy
Commander McLane wrote:
... or were lost in the board-hacking-and-subsequent-restoration of New Year's Eve 2010/11. And it wouldn't be a nice and friendly gesture to delete retired legitimate board members.
That was a heart-in-mouth moment that I do not remember fondly.

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:23 pm
by Cody
DaddyHoggy wrote:
Commander McLane wrote:
... or were lost in the board-hacking-and-subsequent-restoration of New Year's Eve 2010/11. And it wouldn't be a nice and friendly gesture to delete retired legitimate board members.
That was a heart-in-mouth moment that I do not remember fondly.
Oh lord, don't remind me! What McLane says is absolutely right, of course!

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:24 pm
by DaddyHoggy
<group hug>

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:24 am
by Gimi
<shudders and joins>

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:59 am
by JensAyton
Tricky wrote:
Ignore my sig links. Not a link farmer. :mrgreen:
Hang on, that’s what you’d say if…

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:56 am
by CommRLock78

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:30 am
by CommRLock78

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:46 am
by Gimi

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:55 pm
by Gimi

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 11:07 pm
by Cody
Alas, poor Tapsoinsaroda has gone to that great link-farm in the sky!

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:04 am
by CommRLock78
El Viejo wrote:
Alas, poor Tapsoinsaroda has gone to that great link-farm in the sky!
That wonderful place where spam flows like running water :mrgreen:
Image

Re: Reporting spam

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:34 am
by Cody
Here, have a tin of spam OXP!