Re: Inconsistencies and the Wiki
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:47 pm
hej,
As Albee made aware of incorrectnesses, I have started to edit a little the oldships' ships' wikipages, to be congruent with what the oxp's shipdata and shipyard plists contain. (I still have to find ingame a Cat and a Iguana, to see what the game makes of not-clear-to-me entries in the plists.)
But I do not like it for two reasons :
1) There are 3 oxps that contain some or all of these ships, sometimes with different specs.
So, should these different specs be reflected by secondary or even tertiary individual infoboxes ? Or rather have several entries per field, as it does now for the pricing for oldships and PAG 2010 oldships ? This also can get kind of messy.
2) I wonder if the oldships.oxp had been edited by someone ("un-authorised"?) in the past ?
basically every ship where it said on the wiki Extra Cargo Bay : n/a had the x-CB specified in the shipdata/ shipyard plists, and ships that according to the wiki had x-CB : so-so TC (with faulty values) do not have so by shipdata/ shipyard plists. Strange.
Moreover the entries for the extra cargo bay are "un-cleanly" indented, no idea if this could be a sign for later-on inserting of these entries ?
Anyway, maybe murgh would want to / could have a look into the oxp ?
and clean up some messy entries on the way ?
No use in adapting the wiki pages if it turns out the oxp had been "hacked" in the first place.
As Albee made aware of incorrectnesses, I have started to edit a little the oldships' ships' wikipages, to be congruent with what the oxp's shipdata and shipyard plists contain. (I still have to find ingame a Cat and a Iguana, to see what the game makes of not-clear-to-me entries in the plists.)
But I do not like it for two reasons :
1) There are 3 oxps that contain some or all of these ships, sometimes with different specs.
So, should these different specs be reflected by secondary or even tertiary individual infoboxes ? Or rather have several entries per field, as it does now for the pricing for oldships and PAG 2010 oldships ? This also can get kind of messy.
2) I wonder if the oldships.oxp had been edited by someone ("un-authorised"?) in the past ?
basically every ship where it said on the wiki Extra Cargo Bay : n/a had the x-CB specified in the shipdata/ shipyard plists, and ships that according to the wiki had x-CB : so-so TC (with faulty values) do not have so by shipdata/ shipyard plists. Strange.
Moreover the entries for the extra cargo bay are "un-cleanly" indented, no idea if this could be a sign for later-on inserting of these entries ?
Anyway, maybe murgh would want to / could have a look into the oxp ?
and clean up some messy entries on the way ?
No use in adapting the wiki pages if it turns out the oxp had been "hacked" in the first place.