Re: Got to love Glasgow.
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:15 pm
Seconded!Disembodied wrote:A personal request amidst all this: can we keep things civil, please?
For information and discussion about Oolite.
https://bb.oolite.space/
Seconded!Disembodied wrote:A personal request amidst all this: can we keep things civil, please?
You forgot to mention what the loss of those shipyards would mean to both England and its' Navy..Disembodied wrote:There's also the issue as to what might happen to the value of Sterling, should it suddenly find itself without the support of 95% of North Sea oil and 100% of the whisky exports (the two top earners for the UK Treasury). I'm guessing it might drop, sharply: that might be an incentive for Holyrood and Westminster to, you know, negotiate.
Not by as much as some people think. From the Financial Times:Cody wrote:It would however alter the balance at Westminster
John Curtice, professor of politics at Strathclyde University, tells me that while it would be harder for Labour to win [without Scottish votes] it would not be impossible. According to Professor Curtice, Labour would still have won in 1945, 1950, 1997, 2001 and 2005.
In February 1974 there would still have been no majority but the Tories would have nudged ahead of Labour. Eight months later, Harold Wilson’s majority of three would have been obliterated.
In 2005 Labour’s majority of 66, already down steeply from 167 at the previous election, would have been halved – but Tony Blair would have still edged it.
Aye... but enough to deliver a clear Tory majority in the 2015 general election? Possibly - but I ain't any sort of expert!Disembodied wrote:Not by as much as some people think.
Let me explain something to you: I didn't choose to live in America - sorry dude, that was not my choice. And how am I telling anyone how to live? That's a bold statement, seeing as the Scottish people themselves seem to be largely in favor of it - I'm just showing solidarity with them in my support of the decision. So somehow my being in support of it is telling people how to live?Fatleaf wrote:Live in exile? You choose to be in America and it seems you are turning out to be just another loud American that likes to tell everybody else in the world how to live without having any real grasp of the issues involved.
I can maybe see the currency as being an issue, but why on earth would Scotland, as Cim pointed out, need a huge military?Fatleaf wrote:Security: As a separate country they will have to build an armed force for the air, sea and land. With all the coastline Scotland has the Navy would most likely be the priority which would have to include at least one submarine. Scotland would also not qualify to be a member of NATO so that will bring a whole raft of difficulties.
Now with just those two things - Currency and Security - the cost will run into the billions. Scotland has a small population. So what kind of county will it be in comparison to how it is now. Scotland would end up like Greece..
Especially as Scotland is where the Royal Navy base of the UK's nuclear deterrence (the Vanguard-class missile subs) is located - if Scotland does go independent, the subs will have to move someplace else...Diziet Sma wrote:You forgot to mention what the loss of those shipyards would mean to both England and its' Navy..Disembodied wrote:There's also the issue as to what might happen to the value of Sterling, should it suddenly find itself without the support of 95% of North Sea oil and 100% of the whisky exports (the two top earners for the UK Treasury). I'm guessing it might drop, sharply: that might be an incentive for Holyrood and Westminster to, you know, negotiate.
To say nothing of how BAE Systems recently announced the closing of its' Portsmouth shipyard in mid-2014, with a loss of 1,775 jobs, and that the second Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carrier will be relocated to its' Glasgow yards for completion..Ranthe wrote:Especially as Scotland is where the Royal Navy base of the UK's nuclear deterrence (the Vanguard-class missile subs) is located - if Scotland does go independent, the subs will have to move someplace else...Diziet Sma wrote:You forgot to mention what the loss of those shipyards would mean to both England and its' Navy..Disembodied wrote:There's also the issue as to what might happen to the value of Sterling, should it suddenly find itself without the support of 95% of North Sea oil and 100% of the whisky exports (the two top earners for the UK Treasury). I'm guessing it might drop, sharply: that might be an incentive for Holyrood and Westminster to, you know, negotiate.
"Hey! It's not a good night unless you get a traffic cone!" - The Cat, Red Dwarf, "The Last Day"Diziet Sma wrote:<flash on mental image of drunken Glaswegians traffic-coning the new carrier>
<nods>Cody wrote:Seconded!Disembodied wrote:A personal request amidst all this: can we keep things civil, please?
<smirks> I know that feeling all too well.Dawn Trader wrote:... you gotta be slightly drunk to appreciate what you just had.