Griff wrote:i'll have whatever he's having
It's called "Knights moves in psychiatry... It's similar to lateral thinking... something we were all used to try to do before the advent of "PONG"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight%27s_move_thinking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_thinking
Just because you cannot see a logical connection between the moves in mind or speech - it does not necessarily mean there isn't one. The move a knight makes on a chess board is totally illogical to someone who has not fully been taught the rules of chess or draughts - to think that a piece can move by 2x1 or 1x2 in any direction (back wards or forwards) as long as they do not land on an occupied square is bewildering to new chess players.
Merely because I do not smoke a pipe, wear a cardigan, have a beard, use a Mac, use an iPhone/iPad/iPod/iToilet/iFleshube or use YouTube/Twitter/FaceBook/(any) Google services to merely give away all my internet details to the "Big Brother" snooping services of GCHQ and the FBI/CIA/HSA... PLUS Zellers, Target, Wallmart et al... does that make me such an outcast from this site?
I think not... I might slip up occasionally - but let he who is without sin cast the first
ICE ASTEROID.... (and then duck!)
Am I the only (and first) one who has made himself look like a total dickhead on this website?
Yeah.... well... don't all shout, too loud, at once!...
BTW the
paragraph...
"We want information..."
Number 6:
You won't get it.
Number 2: By hook or by crook, we will.
Number 6:
Who are you?
Number 2: The new Number 2.
Number 6: Who is Number 1?
Number 2: You are Number 6.
Number 6: I am not a number, I am a free man.
Is a quote from the intro sequence from the original 1960's TV program called
"The Prisoner" starring
Patrick McGoohan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14eUKogPF7s
McGoohan's strong but
perpetually bewildered character
"Number 6" is responding to (through the constantly rotating - and seemingly endless -
"Number 2" characters) an ultimately responsible character called
"Number 1" - whom we never ever get to see...
I simply aligned my initial confusion of entering into this particular BB and the arrogance of some of the old-school "cardigans" on this board as being similar to
"Danger Man" having been dumped into
"The Village."
BTW - I never stopped being 13 years-old 45 years ago - I still as adept at
TWUNTERY as I was back then!....
Oh and YES... I can use the word
TWUNTERY because I was the first one to define it (
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SevenT) eight years ago on the
Urban Dictionary.
Just answering a point - no need to shovel this off to a "flame-war" section or a "new topic" - I am sure that the "Splash screen doesn't splash!" readers will forgive this tiny little diversion....
Carry on... Nothing to see here...