Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:52 am
by Sarin
I prefer word Windoom...
XPs weren't that bad tho...in comparison with Vista.
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:53 am
by Frame
Sarin wrote:I prefer word Windoom...
XPs weren't that bad tho...in comparison with Vista.
yup XP is fine... Vista is Slower!!!!...
It seems like a project gone all Wrong....
In short, if they threw in more crap, the more crap the CPU has to deal with, therefore the OS slows down the system...
The trick is, not to add more crap, but to reduce crap... but the crappy programmers of microsoft, forgot all about common programming virtues...
In short, when you hire crap, to program... you get crap...
While this may not fully apply to all members, but surely the project lead members..
...
Crap... and i bought it and installed it... Crap on me!!!
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:52 pm
by CptnEcho
I liked Windows-95/98 (heck, I liked DOS 5.0) and I've been using Windows-XP for several years.
I've purchased the Linux Bible 2007, installed Debian Linux on a system and have an OpenSUSE Live CD so I can become familiar with Linux.
Linux has improved enough to compete effectively for O.S. market share, in my opinion. I see no need for me to purchase Windows Vista.
Edited to add: Puppy Linux is a nice distribution too.
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:58 pm
by nijineko
anti-bloat?
"darn" small linux. (actually something else, i'm sure you get it.)