There's a lot to be said for implication... Personally, if I'm reading a story with pornographic scenes (as opposed to a PWP) and it gets too detailed on the mechanics of the act, I tend to find myself skimming past large portions of it. If you focus too much on the mechanics then you lose the emotional component - it becomes a story about the act, instead of being a story about the characters interacting, and in a story that's primarily driven by the emotional interactions of the characters like this one it tends to fall flat.Paradox wrote:The next chapter also brought on another dilemma. I was really beginning to push that "fine line/fence/wall" I have mentioned in the past. There is still nothing explicit. I have not jumped the wall, but I have seen it's top. And I wasn't sure it was appropriate for this wiki. After reading it over and over however. I don't feel the line has been crossed, and in the end, I have decided to post it as is.
However, the other side of the wall calls to me. };] Tempting me to elucidate upon certain moments and scenes. To write in a few true "bodice ripper" scenes (do they make bodice spacesuits?). I pondered earlier about there being another barrier beyond the one I have currently followed. And I put these questions now to my readers. Can one be explicit, without being pornographic? And, is anyone here interested in reading it, if I make a foray in that direction?
I think you struck a good balance in that last chapter. Showing the lead up, then implying the act itself.
- Neelix