Re: Reporting spam
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:41 pm
Ah, must be clean then:
SFS wrote:Found 0 entries for "gobbledegook"
For information and discussion about Oolite.
https://bb.oolite.space/
SFS wrote:Found 0 entries for "gobbledegook"
Code: Select all
2028 POOPHYFAPPY
2029 beneoumvemied
2030 Invornessesee
2031 Gelabarp
2032 Tonadalnund
2033 AbsesyPex
2034 exolvezow
2035 SHEEFSDYDAY
Some of them are a bit on the edge - but as some of them list Oolite as part of their interests, others have their own IT/PC related businesses - they don't show up on SFS or on Google being elsewhere (much) and most of them didn't post but just lurked for a bit after joining - I think we'll leave them for a bit - I'm much more interested in the fresh of the press spammers and the hundreds of inactive members that might suddenly become spammers at any moment!Fatleaf wrote:Would any of these be classed as really old spam? Or even a bit moldy!
rib https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... ile&u=2007
E_LE_ts https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... ile&u=1571
NCarter https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... ofile&u=38
Fost https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... file&u=788
gongoozler https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... ile&u=1217
chomperman https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... file&u=127
Co https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... file&u=341
Wakeless https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... file&u=280
Loki https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... file&u=279
Austin https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... ile&u=2936
digitallysane https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... file&u=487
pokatinzy1 https://bb.oolite.space/memberlist.php?m ... ile&u=1236
Just thought I would look for a few older ones as to beat CheeseRedux to it is proving difficult
just nuked pyjubes while it was online - nothing on the email but the IP (with two different email addresses (different before the @, same after it)) hit as I was searching for 'it'.El Viejo wrote:Did someone mention fresh spam?... mmm, lovely!
Ditto!DaddyHoggy wrote:nothing on the email but the IP (with two different email addresses (different before the @, same after it)) hit as I was searching for 'it'.El Viejo wrote:Did someone mention fresh spam?... mmm, lovely!
Oh, come now. I left out a couple, didn't I? Besides, 'tis not my fault I was the only one awake when they decided to sneak in en masse.Fatleaf wrote:Just thought I would look for a few older ones as to beat CheeseRedux to it is proving difficult
Ever vigilant... when the assassins aren't around, the spotters are... cool.CheeseRedux wrote:Besides, 'tis not my fault I was the only one awake when they decided to sneak in en masse.
(I've not repeated the original bit.ly link, obviously). But it's a spambot, no error.elmirandalp wrote:Not working! here is the working bot: http://bit.ly/XXXXX.