? windows 7 on HP

Off topic discussion zone.

Moderators: winston, another_commander, Cody

User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Post by DaddyHoggy »

Cmd. Cheyd wrote:
To delve into on what DH said-
ANY 32-bit OS (XP, Vista, Linux, Mac, you name it) has 4294967296 (2^32) addresses it can allocate to memory. BUT, your other hardware has to also have addresses, so that max amount is lowered by the amount needed by the other hardware components. This address space doesn't reduce the amount of ram on the system but it does reduce the number of addresses the CPU can allocate to memory. This is why some folks can address 2.8GB, others 3.3GB, and someone else 3.8GB.

And just to answer for whoever is about to ask - 64-bit OS's can address 16.8 million terabytes.
Yeh, we tried one of our 4GB machines with 2 SLI'd 1GB GTX285s running under XP32 -hmmmmm..... :roll:
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
allikat
Deadly
Deadly
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:45 pm

Post by allikat »

DaddyHoggy wrote:
Yeh, we tried one of our 4GB machines with 2 SLI'd 1GB GTX285s running under XP32 -hmmmmm..... :roll:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Way to go transform 2GB of memory into an energy wasting paper-weight :D
Commander Monty, a Python Class Cruiser driver :D
Iron assed bulk haulers for the win!

Of the two trumbles which escaped today from Lave station, only 473 have been located....
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Post by DaddyHoggy »

allikat wrote:
DaddyHoggy wrote:
Yeh, we tried one of our 4GB machines with 2 SLI'd 1GB GTX285s running under XP32 -hmmmmm..... :roll:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Way to go transform 2GB of memory into an energy wasting paper-weight :D
We needed to do it justify the upgrade to Windows 7 - it didn't take long! :)
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
Diziet Sma
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 6312
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:20 pm
Location: Aboard the Pitviper S.E. "Blackwidow"

Post by Diziet Sma »

DH.. you forgot the most important bit.. after you got Win7 and plugged in those 2 GTX285s, how well does it run Oolite? :mrgreen:
Most games have some sort of paddling-pool-and-water-wings beginning to ease you in: Oolite takes the rather more Darwinian approach of heaving you straight into the ocean, often with a brick or two in your pockets for luck. ~ Disembodied
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Post by DaddyHoggy »

Diziet Sma wrote:
DH.. you forgot the most important bit.. after you got Win7 and plugged in those 2 GTX285s, how well does it run Oolite? :mrgreen:
It doesn't seem to make any difference - I presume OpenGL/Oolite isn't natively capable of making the most of the SLI?

Elsewhere in this forum you will have already seen a single GTX285 running Oolite via a Matrox Triple Head 2 Go - that was very nice indeed.
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
Post Reply