Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:41 pm
by Commander McLane
Sendraks wrote:Commander McLane, salvage gangs are one of my favourite parts of the game.
Thanks!
Sendraks wrote:I really like the detail on and inside the asteroid.
To be fair: The model is a work by Killer Wolf, and the shaders (light effects in the tunnel) are by Griff. I only had the idea to randomly place a ship under the machines, and added the flashers (especially the one featured in the screenshot which simulates the welding on the Cobra).
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:47 pm
by JensAyton
El Viejo wrote:I like the last bit..."the masterful Oolite". Sums it up nicely.
It’s commanderful, too!
Incidentally, by pure coincidence those same screen shots can be found at
http://www.oolite.org/gallery.
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:53 pm
by Kaks
Which reminds me: the last screenshot - the one demonstrating the advanced nav array - had a bit of a graphic glitch (Reesdice printed twice, and with different size & position) that I noticed a while ago & was corrected in trunk a short-ish time ago while I was 'playing' with F6/F6.
Time to redo that picture?
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:39 am
by Commander McLane
Ahruman wrote:El Viejo wrote:I like the last bit..."the masterful Oolite". Sums it up nicely.
It’s commanderful, too!
Incidentally, by pure coincidence those same screen shots can be found at
http://www.oolite.org/gallery.
Yes, of course. But still I may take a tiny little bit of pride in the fact that they feature something I have done, please?
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:44 pm
by JensAyton
Commander McLane wrote:Ahruman wrote:El Viejo wrote:I like the last bit..."the masterful Oolite". Sums it up nicely.
It’s commanderful, too!
Incidentally, by pure coincidence those same screen shots can be found at
http://www.oolite.org/gallery.
Yes, of course. But still I may take a tiny little bit of pride in the fact that they feature something I have done, please?
Since you ask… no. Because the selection of images for the gallery was of course completely random with no consideration given to aesthetic or technical merit. :-p
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:48 pm
by Rxke
Should we include this article in the list for the 'real' wikipedia oolite article?
I know notability of the article has been established, but you never know, maybe in the future they raise the bar even higher.
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:06 pm
by DaddyHoggy
Rxke wrote:Should we include this article in the list for the 'real' wikipedia oolite article?
I know notability of the article has been established, but you never know, maybe in the future they raise the bar even higher.
Sounds like a good idea to me!
..
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:22 am
by Lestradae
Rxke wrote:Should we include this article in the list for the 'real' wikipedia oolite article? ... I know notability of the article has been established, but you never know, maybe in the future they raise the bar even higher.
How much higher than appearing in a games magazine
can they reasonably raise the bar?
OK, already got the logical error I made, it's in introducing the word "reasonable", I guess ...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:33 pm
by DaddyHoggy
David McMahon wrote:on the case....
How do I upload a *.pdf here?
Did this ever happen? I wouldn't mind reading the article.
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:55 pm
by ClymAngus
DaddyHoggy wrote:David McMahon wrote:on the case....
How do I upload a *.pdf here?
Did this ever happen? I wouldn't mind reading the article.
I refer the honorable Avian to page one.
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:34 pm
by DaddyHoggy
ClymAngus wrote:DaddyHoggy wrote:David McMahon wrote:on the case....
How do I upload a *.pdf here?
Did this ever happen? I wouldn't mind reading the article.
I refer the honorable Avian to page one.
Eek!
Where did that come from? I'm sure it wasn't there last time I looked!
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear...