tl;dr version ........ both.Wildeblood wrote:For his fictional works, or his science popularization efforts?spud42 wrote:Asimov
a very smart and interesting man.chemistry,biology what didnt he do? wonder how many people knew he was a professor?
Moderators: winston, another_commander, Cody
tl;dr version ........ both.Wildeblood wrote:For his fictional works, or his science popularization efforts?spud42 wrote:Asimov
Well, er, me! Now's the time to confess I'm not a fan of sci-fi and have never read any of Asimov's fiction.spud42 wrote:tl;dr version ........ both.Wildeblood wrote:For his fictional works, or his science popularization efforts?spud42 wrote:Asimov
a very smart and interesting man.chemistry,biology what didn't he do? wonder how many people knew he was a professor?
You didn't miss anything, I've read a few just to see what was being talked about.Wildeblood wrote:Well, er, me! Now's the time to confess I'm not a fan of sci-fi and have never read any of Asimov's fiction.
Four laws. But they can be explained concisely in a one-page article. They don't justify a series of [how many?] novels.spud42 wrote:dude Asimov invented the three laws of robotics... lol