I don't understand that comment at all. An allusion too far, perhaps.UK_Eliter wrote:So the only alternatives for Oolite expansion pack management are (1) Windows 8 style accessibility (or, one might think, would-be accessibility) or (2) the status quo exactly as it is? Surely that is a false dichotomy.
"Rendered useless" is a gross overstatement, but all co-operative activity is corrupted by lying.UK_Eliter wrote:Moreover, I don't see why my proposed change would be rendered useless by lying. Some expansion packs clearly use quite a few resources and I imagine that at least many of the authors of such packs would label them accordingly.
Firstly, liars aren't all ensconced in underground lairs, stroking white cats, and laughing in a deranged manner*. It's the effect, not any malicious intent, that matters, and "A man who would lie to himself would lie to anyone". In the case of graphics such categorization can be fairly obvious; given Griff's Stations Full-size Textures & Griff's Stations Half-size Textures you know (a) which one belongs in which category & (b) the creator actually gives a damn, so even the larger is unlikely to contain unnecessary bloat. In other cases it's not so easy; there are a lot of OXPs containing useless faff. If the authors of those bad OXPs knew or cared surely they'd improve them, so I can only conclude they either over-estimate their abilities or just don't care.
Secondly, because of the way lying works to corrupt usable information and increase uncertainty, the most damage is done when 50% of people lie, not when 100% do. It's one of those statistical thingamies. If you think people who will knowingly lie + people who don't care + people who over-estimate their own ability < 50%, then you're more generous than I am.
Thirdly, I was not disparaging the suggestion, just trying to point out that like everything that includes a human factor, the result would be worse than the ideal.
* "in a deranged manner": a squiggly, red line appeared under "derangedly", which seemed like a perfectly good adverb to me...?