Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

General discussion for players of Oolite.

Moderators: winston, another_commander

User avatar
Staer9
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 570
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 4:53 pm
Location: Hatfield, Hertfordshire (poor industrial)

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Staer9 »

Rxke wrote:
(this is a joke:) we could re-use banned spammer's names/handles :twisted:
or use them in random-hits oxp :twisted:
Image
Zireael
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 1396
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:44 pm

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Zireael »

First post updated: features grouped, links added, two new requests added to the list.
User avatar
Azured
Above Average
Above Average
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 7:11 am

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Azured »

Financial options when purchasing a spacecraft.

Things like down payments, income deductions on account, monthly instalments, premiums, interest etc.

I know we now have the Black Monks, but it's an OXP and their methods are financially speaking rather unrefined. In the Ooniverse it would only make sense that there exists similar systems for purchasing spacecraft as we now have in the automobile market. This would help a new player to more easily switch their starter craft to something more to their liking.
I like my women how I like my laser beams: Thin and bristling with concealed power.
User avatar
Commander McLane
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 9520
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:08 am
Location: a Hacker Outpost in a moderately remote area
Contact:

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Commander McLane »

El Viejo wrote:
Zireael wrote:
FAQ
There will not be Q-bombs
Do you mean energy bombs?
I stumbled over the same.

"There will not be Q-bombs" is very likely false, at least I haven't heard anything about removing them from the developers.

The Energy Bomb, on the other hand, will indeed be removed, if I understand the developers correctly.

So the sentence should read "There will be no energy bombs" or something of the like.
User avatar
aegidian
Master and Commander
Master and Commander
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by aegidian »

Commander McLane wrote:
El Viejo wrote:
Zireael wrote:
FAQ
There will not be Q-bombs
Do you mean energy bombs?
I stumbled over the same.

"There will not be Q-bombs" is very likely false, at least I haven't heard anything about removing them from the developers.

The Energy Bomb, on the other hand, will indeed be removed, if I understand the developers correctly.

So the sentence should read "There will be no energy bombs" or something of the like.
What he said. K, you seem to be confusing two separate things here, Q-Bombs are not Energy Bombs.

Energy Bombs are a legacy from original elite, and a hark back to what David Braben describes as "3-lives" style gameplay. They were a 'get-out-of-jail-free' card and as such only the player used them (you never came across Energy-Bomb-using NPCs.)

The Q-Bomb (named from the movie 'The Mouse That Roared' - a favourite of mine) was my attempt to redress the imbalance between the player and other ships caused by the Energy Bomb - a big, flaming weapon that could occasionally be used by other ships, and which was survivable for the player (if you run fast enough).

Now I know Energy Bombs are not going to be in Oolite 2, for the very reason I outlined above - all items should be used (and be seen to be used) by the player and NPC alike. But I don't recall hearing anything about the Q-Bomb.


Incidentally I believe the Torus jump drive should be replaced or modified too, for the same reason - only the player gets it in Oolite. I'd personally prefer to see NPC's get to use it in Oolite 2, but lets see what Ahruman decides.
"The planet Rear is scourged by well-intentioned OXZs."

Oolite models and gear? click here!
User avatar
JensAyton
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Grand Admiral Emeritus
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by JensAyton »

Wot they said: Q-bombs are in, energy bombs are out. (In fact, this has been implemented already; for a while, trunk builds would replace energy bombs with Q-bombs or the corresponding sum of money.)
aegidian wrote:
Incidentally I believe the Torus jump drive should be replaced or modified too, for the same reason - only the player gets it in Oolite. I'd personally prefer to see NPC's get to use it in Oolite 2, but lets see what Ahruman decides.
I’ve thought about the issue, but not decided anything. Another option would be to use time acceleration instead, possibly with mass locking and slowed down controls to get a similar effect to the current torus drive with no “in-universe” imbalance.
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by DaddyHoggy »

Azured wrote:
Financial options when purchasing a spacecraft.

Things like down payments, income deductions on account, monthly instalments, premiums, interest etc.

I know we now have the Black Monks, but it's an OXP and their methods are financially speaking rather unrefined. In the Ooniverse it would only make sense that there exists similar systems for purchasing spacecraft as we now have in the automobile market. This would help a new player to more easily switch their starter craft to something more to their liking.
The Black Monks was a very clever OXP for its time but pre-empted JS scripting by some considerable time, hence the crude calculations and repayment methodology.

Little Bear isn't around as much as he was - but I'm sure somebody could expand Black Monks - there was also a thread some time ago (years probably) where somebody wanted to introduce banking to Oolite - I remember because I created some of the banks and their back stories!
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by DaddyHoggy »

Ahruman wrote:
Wot they said: Q-bombs are in, energy bombs are out. (In fact, this has been implemented already; for a while, trunk builds would replace energy bombs with Q-bombs or the corresponding sum of money.)
aegidian wrote:
Incidentally I believe the Torus jump drive should be replaced or modified too, for the same reason - only the player gets it in Oolite. I'd personally prefer to see NPC's get to use it in Oolite 2, but lets see what Ahruman decides.
I’ve thought about the issue, but not decided anything. Another option would be to use time acceleration instead, possibly with mass locking and slowed down controls to get a similar effect to the current torus drive with no “in-universe” imbalance.
Gets my vote - the torus drive is another player-centric hang-up from the old days on slow 8-bit machines - Accelerated time is just that and if you need to explain it - then the old StarDreamer handwavium fallback will do very nicely.
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by DaddyHoggy »

DaddyHoggy wrote:
Azured wrote:
Financial options when purchasing a spacecraft.

Things like down payments, income deductions on account, monthly instalments, premiums, interest etc.

I know we now have the Black Monks, but it's an OXP and their methods are financially speaking rather unrefined. In the Ooniverse it would only make sense that there exists similar systems for purchasing spacecraft as we now have in the automobile market. This would help a new player to more easily switch their starter craft to something more to their liking.
The Black Monks was a very clever OXP for its time but pre-empted JS scripting by some considerable time, hence the crude calculations and repayment methodology.

Little Bear isn't around as much as he was - but I'm sure somebody could expand Black Monks - there was also a thread some time ago (years probably) where somebody wanted to introduce banking to Oolite - I remember because I created some of the banks and their back stories!
Turns out it was another Commander McLane undertaking which I guess has gone unfulfilled due to other interests...

https://bb.oolite.space/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5681
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
Cmdr Wyvern
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 1649
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Somewhere in the great starry void

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Cmdr Wyvern »

E-bombs vs Q-bombs, my .2cr worth.

If y'all intend to replace the E-bomb with the Q-bomb, then make it a total replacement. That is, same price, can carry only one, and it's a one-button launch from a hull mount as opposed to the select-arm-launch from a missile pylon method currently used.

Kind of like this: Pay your 900cr, find something to blow up, press the launch key, and 5 seconds later big blue balls o' death. Better light the injectors after launching of course, or be one of those balls o' death yourself.
No cargo left over to scoop tho; are you sure you really want to push that expensive button o' doom?
Running Oolite buttery smooth & rock stable w/ tons of eyecandy oxps on:
ASUS Prime X370-A
Ryzen 5 1500X
16GB DDR4 3200MHZ
128GB NVMe M.2 SSD (Boot drive)
1TB Hybrid HDD (For software and games)
EVGA GTX-1070 SC
1080P Samsung large screen monitor
User avatar
Cmdr Wyvern
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 1649
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Somewhere in the great starry void

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Cmdr Wyvern »

Staer9 wrote:
Rxke wrote:
(this is a joke:) we could re-use banned spammer's names/handles :twisted:
or use them in random-hits oxp :twisted:
"[SPAMMER_NAME]wanted dead or very dead, for flogging useless products on innocent GalNet nodes. Terminate with extreme laser surgery for the princely sum of 45,000cr." :twisted: :lol:
Running Oolite buttery smooth & rock stable w/ tons of eyecandy oxps on:
ASUS Prime X370-A
Ryzen 5 1500X
16GB DDR4 3200MHZ
128GB NVMe M.2 SSD (Boot drive)
1TB Hybrid HDD (For software and games)
EVGA GTX-1070 SC
1080P Samsung large screen monitor
User avatar
DaddyHoggy
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Intergalactic Spam Assassin
Posts: 8515
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Newbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by DaddyHoggy »

Problem is - most Spammer Names as easy to spot nonsense and therefore would be rather immersion breaking nonsense in game too (short of inserting random ' and the like into the name to indicate so kind of difficult to pronounce literal translation of a non-humanoid name/song/chirp/squeak/click etc.)
Selezen wrote:
Apparently I was having a DaddyHoggy moment.
Oolite Life is now revealed here
User avatar
Commander McLane
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 9520
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:08 am
Location: a Hacker Outpost in a moderately remote area
Contact:

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Commander McLane »

DaddyHoggy wrote:
DaddyHoggy wrote:
Little Bear isn't around as much as he was - but I'm sure somebody could expand Black Monks - there was also a thread some time ago (years probably) where somebody wanted to introduce banking to Oolite - I remember because I created some of the banks and their back stories!
Turns out it was another Commander McLane undertaking which I guess has gone unfulfilled due to other interests...

https://bb.oolite.space/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5681
Mainly due to my inability to decide whether it should turn out as a money sink or a get-rich scheme. Somehow I felt that on the one hand really huge loans would be too difficult to repay, and on the other hand receiving interest from huge savings would be too boring a way of making money. It felt un-Elitey. So at the end of the day the project lacked a clear direction. It seemed like a good idea in the beginning, but after thinking it through more thoroughly I wasn't so sure about its worth for the game anymore.
User avatar
Cmdr Wyvern
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 1649
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Somewhere in the great starry void

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Cmdr Wyvern »

DaddyHoggy wrote:
Problem is - most Spammer Names as easy to spot nonsense and therefore would be rather immersion breaking nonsense in game too (short of inserting random ' and the like into the name to indicate so kind of difficult to pronounce literal translation of a non-humanoid name/song/chirp/squeak/click etc.)
True, but still...
..."Your fellow killers opine that this whacking would be very satisfying." :P
Running Oolite buttery smooth & rock stable w/ tons of eyecandy oxps on:
ASUS Prime X370-A
Ryzen 5 1500X
16GB DDR4 3200MHZ
128GB NVMe M.2 SSD (Boot drive)
1TB Hybrid HDD (For software and games)
EVGA GTX-1070 SC
1080P Samsung large screen monitor
Switeck
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 2411
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 11:11 pm

Re: Feature requests for Oolite 2.0

Post by Switeck »

Commander McLane wrote:
Mainly due to my inability to decide whether it should turn out as a money sink or a get-rich scheme. Somehow I felt that on the one hand really huge loans would be too difficult to repay, and on the other hand receiving interest from huge savings would be too boring a way of making money. It felt un-Elitey. So at the end of the day the project lacked a clear direction. It seemed like a good idea in the beginning, but after thinking it through more thoroughly I wasn't so sure about its worth for the game anymore.
If the savings resembled current savings accounts:
1.Very slow interest (like 3.65% per year...or 0.01% compounded per day, rounded down).
2.ATM penalties (like 10 credits for withdraw, 100 credits for withdraw from another system, and 1000 credits for withdraw from another galaxy).
3.Large penalty fees for early withdraw (min. of 30 day account -- otherwise suffer an additional 1000 credit fee).
4.Account freezing or outright seizure for pirate/terrorist activities. (...also including attacking their ships.)
5.Minimum balance requirements of 10,000 credits...or suffer no interest and a 10 credit penalty a day till the money is all gone.
6.Opening/closing account costs, same as ATM penalties for withdraw depending on where it's done.
7.Interest Income Taxes -- 5% of the earned interest amount! For yet another thing to drag the account balance down. Paid monthly.

All said, I think that's hardly a fast way to make money...but it's about all you can do with credits after you have over 1 million. :lol:

As for loans, the standard loan it currently has is ridiculous. It'd be better if there was a 2000 credit short-term (15-30 day) starter loan with likewise smaller interest than the current 20000 credit loan. Like 100 credit/day "interest" rate till paid off. Defaulters are hit with a small bounty on their heads -- like maybe 5-20 credits, so Black Monk enforcers don't get one themselves attacking them.
To encourage paying off late loans, instead of killing you when you dock with the BM Monastery...just strip your ship of equipment and/or paying a huge penalty fee.
Maybe after paying off the starter loan, offer the 20000 credit loan (or the 2000 credit loan again) a day later that's like the original loan.
If that gets paid off, offer a 100000 credit loan with 1000 credit/day starting interest (1% compounded daily!) but is "good" for a year before you have to pay it all off. :twisted:
Locked