Page 8 of 9
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:05 pm
by Fatleaf
ralph_hh wrote:... A whole industrialized planet should be able to fabricate more than this.
Yup, it just goes to show how small and insignificant the player truly is in the Ooniverse.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:34 pm
by Disembodied
ralph_hh wrote:A whole industrialized planet should be able to fabricate more than this.
It undoubtedly can - the question is whether it's there for you to buy. The market you have access to as a small independent trader is very much just the scraps from the big boys' table: most of the bulk trade is tied up by the big shipping lines, and they don't want the hassle of dealing with small-scale competition. That said, if you have the cargo space, you can take shot at a few cargo contracts, too.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:46 pm
by Smivs
ralph_hh wrote:I was thinking about standard milk runs by trading between RI/PA systems - just to earn money as fast as possible, which is how economy in general works.
I'm not sure that's true, really. Yes, early on the milk-runs are about the only way a new trader in a smal ship can earn a living, but look at the
real economy where (as Big D says) it is the big corporations doing most of the trade, mostly unseen by the masses.
In the more human-scale economy it is the entrepreneurs making the money. The Arthur Daleys, the guy with a white van and a lock-up full of stock who buys cheap and sells later at a profit. This is what the freighters are so good for - white van and lock-up rolled into one that goes wherever the money is to be had.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:55 pm
by ralph_hh
Well, thanks all, after reading this, I do not feel so bad anymore, blowing up innocent freighters
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:58 pm
by Diziet Sma
Another bit of handwavium sometimes offered to explain the 127TC limit is that it's not actually all that's available.. it's all that's available FOR YOU. If a single 'Conda could buy up everything available, there'd be nothing left for all the NPC traders to purchase.. so GalCop limits the amount any single Commander can buy.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:59 pm
by Cody
ralph_hh wrote:Well, thanks all, after reading this, I do not feel so bad anymore, blowing up innocent freighters
So vicious! Poor innocent traders!
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 2:17 pm
by Smivs
Cody wrote:ralph_hh wrote:Well, thanks all, after reading this, I do not feel so bad anymore, blowing up innocent freighters
So vicious! Poor innocent traders!
Poor Arthur Daley
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 7:55 pm
by spara
I made a secondary market to test legality_export and legality_import parameters. What do these do exactly? I tested all combinations with a behemoth parked next to the main station and they did not seem to do anything except filling the Legal column with Lm, Re and Ex. I was able to buy & sell whatever I wanted and launch & dock without interference. Was I just really lucky or have I misunderstood something?
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:06 pm
by cim
Check the market_monitored
property. For compatibility with 1.80 this defaults to false for non-main stations. So, it's illegal to sell X there, but it's not as if anyone actually checks.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:17 pm
by spara
cim wrote:Check the market_monitored
property. For compatibility with 1.80 this defaults to false for non-main stations. So, it's illegal to sell X there, but it's not as if anyone actually checks.
Now I figured it
. I had the property configured to 1, but since it seemed that nothing happened, I was a bit puzzled. Actually something was happening, there just was no notification other than seeing my legal status go down. I noticed that when I docked and launched a few times and the behemoth opened fire at me
.
This might need some work to be intuitive for the player. Maybe a warning report when docking for the first time letting you hand over the contraband like illegal_goods oxp does and something to warn you when you're about to launch with contraband.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 9:45 pm
by phkb
Question: In 1.81, am I correct in assuming you have to use trade-goods.plist now, not commodities.plist?
Maybe some conversion script could be written to update the old plists?
Has a conversion script been written for commodities.plists?
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:16 pm
by cim
phkb wrote:Question: In 1.81, am I correct in assuming you have to use trade-goods.plist now, not commodities.plist?
trade-goods.plist
for defining new trade goods or overriding the core definition for a trade good.
shipdata.plist
(the new
market_*
properties) for defining secondary station markets with respect to the existing (or potentially existing) trade goods.
planetinfo.plist
(the
market_script
property) to make JS-based market rules for the primary system market, either extending or overriding the data in
trade-goods.plist
phkb wrote:Maybe some conversion script could be written to update the old plists?
Has a conversion script been written for commodities.plists?
Not that I know of.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:14 am
by spara
phkb wrote:Maybe some conversion script could be written to update the old plists?
Has a conversion script been written for commodities.plists?
In the current Behemoth OXP I use a js script that has the old commodities.plist defined inside and uses the legacy formula to calculate the prices/quantities. You might want to check it out.
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 7:02 am
by Ranthe
Smivs wrote:ralph_hh wrote:
I always wonder what sense it might make to purchase a freighter ship wilst the local station supplies only a fraction of the tonnage needed to fill this ships cargo hold...
You can buy more than one commodity at once, you know. Say you're heading out from a rich industrial, buy up all the computers and luxuries and anything else that looks cheap. This can often amount to well over 100TC of cargo. If your next stop is a poor agri or similar, sell for a big fat profit. If not then hold on to some or all of it until you can show a good profit. Even buy more computers etc if your next call is another RI. In other words you have the space to hold stock for a while to maximise your profit from it.
This approach is basically how I operate
Atomic Annie to build up the "Ranthe retires in luxury on Esdi" fund
Smivs wrote:Cody wrote:ralph_hh wrote:Well, thanks all, after reading this, I do not feel so bad anymore, blowing up innocent freighters
So vicious! Poor innocent traders!
Poor Arthur Daley
I resemble that remark!
Re: Proposal for 1.82: support for economic changes
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 6:53 pm
by spara
I've been fiddling with secondary market definitions quite a bit now and overall it's quite nice. To be able to set prices in relation to the system prices is very nice indeed. There's one thing I'm missing though. I would like to be able to set a fixed price in market_definition. I don't think that's currently possible. I know I can do it in marker_script, but then I would need to define other goods there too. Have I overlooked/misunderstood something? If not, could this be added, if possible?