weapon_position_foo working again!

Discussion and information relevant to creating special missions, new ships, skins etc.

Moderators: winston, another_commander

Post Reply
User avatar
Kaks
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 3009
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Big Smoke

weapon_position_foo working again!

Post by Kaks »

Looking at the posts, quite a few oxp writers have had to find workarounds for the broken weapon_postion_foo settings.

I can now confirm that as of 1.73 - or straight from trunk - setting the weapons positions will work again, with millimetric precision!

Cheers,

Kaks.
Hey, free OXPs: farsun v1.05 & tty v0.5! :0)
User avatar
Eric Walch
Slightly Grand Rear Admiral
Slightly Grand Rear Admiral
Posts: 5536
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 3:48 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: weapon_position_foo working again!

Post by Eric Walch »

Kaks wrote:
I can now confirm that as of 1.73 - or straight from trunk - setting the weapons positions will work again, with millimetric precision!
Great work Kaks. Now we probably will have new ship oxp's were the laser is exactly were the author has programmed it but never wanted it there.
User avatar
Kaks
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Quite Grand Sub-Admiral
Posts: 3009
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:41 pm
Location: The Big Smoke

Post by Kaks »

Hehe, that's the sort of thing I hope will be avoided, by giving enough advance warning! :)
Hey, free OXPs: farsun v1.05 & tty v0.5! :0)
User avatar
Thargoid
Thargoid
Thargoid
Posts: 5528
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:55 pm

Post by Thargoid »

*** Can almost hear the scream from Vienna when Lestradae reads this thread :twisted: ***
User avatar
Lestradae
---- E L I T E ----
---- E L I T E ----
Posts: 3095
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

..

Post by Lestradae »

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! :shock:

Great. New old feature. Will enable much better laser position.

I am sure that some OSE Betatesters will help me go through the deserts of data and apply shiny new laser positions :twisted:

:(

L
Post Reply