Oh it has. It's got sequential landing lights, illuminated alignment markers, the lot. And it's still challenging! This is not going to be one for the impatient or cack-handed.mossfoot wrote:Wouldn't a variation of docking lights help?

Moderators: winston, another_commander
Oh it has. It's got sequential landing lights, illuminated alignment markers, the lot. And it's still challenging! This is not going to be one for the impatient or cack-handed.mossfoot wrote:Wouldn't a variation of docking lights help?
Good point.. I've added a note to step 3 of the OXZ Guide to make this clearer.Smivs wrote:The Contractor did have a poor identifier, and apologies for any problems caused by the change. While I was getting to grips with the whole OXZ thing I did give three or four of my OXZs identifiers which included the version number which was not a good idea at all as subsequent updates would have had one version number in the identifier, and another for the actual OXZ.
Well.. there IS a cure for that, you know..Smivs wrote:Meanwhile I can happily go insane trying to live with this horrid single-core Windows machine
Been there - at least it failed gently (I presume), rather than taking other components out with it?Smivs wrote:Computer meltdown! My PSU has failed...
New. I replaced it fairly recently. I'm assuming it is OK.Cody wrote:How old is the HDD?