Have the sedimentary layers been carbon dated
Sediments cannot be carbon dated. Only that which was animal or vegetable returns valid results. Interestingly carbon dating returns two clearly identifiable results for ancient remains and invariably the larger is taken as representing the age in which it lived.
So, what makes you say it isn't natural?
What I said was that no theory exists to explain its formation. It's presence is unaccountable by any known theory. I did not say it was unnatural but I am unconvinced it was formed by the same processes that formed the strata around it.
In particular... by what process does pitchblende form?
Elaborate. With examples.
You were given an example. Did you, as suggested, compare the image with the corresponding frame from NASA or JPL? Ignore any claims as to what those objects are. Accompanying texts are, probably, not relevant.
What did you want images of?
What we were talking about! In particular rectilinear detail.
... with a wider angle lens.
There are multiple cameras, a wide area and high magnification
Is it a spoof conspiracy site, BTW?
Probably? I am only concerned with the image itself and do not bother reading any textual output which is usually by 'von Dunnykin' or similar. I'm glad whatever they say is the cause of mirth for you SandJ and I am beginning to suspect that I also fall into that category. There are some theories that follow plausible lines of thought as to what the smudges represent but by the sound of it they are not discussed on the site where the image was hosted.
[edit] Lol@Commander McLane - Madonna a reptile? I thought that was common knowledge! But the politician thing is almost certainly a typo and should read extra-testicle :/ [/edit]