Search found 399 matches
- Mon May 12, 2025 1:53 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: Starting in a different galaxy
- Replies: 30
- Views: 5439
Re: Starting in a different galaxy
If you're determined to be bland, just "Alternative Starts". So, we already have Start Choices (2013) and Start Choices Addenda (2018?). If you did not already know what they do, how would you guess from the name alone? Adder Start (2017), though, is self-explanatory. Start Choices gives ...
- Sun May 11, 2025 1:08 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: Starting in a different galaxy
- Replies: 30
- Views: 5439
Re: Starting in a different galaxy
Any chance of a wiki page, and of course a link to it in these threads?Cholmondely wrote: ↑Sun May 11, 2025 10:19 amI've also added the link to the OXP release thread at the top of the very first post. Thank you!
- Thu May 08, 2025 11:48 am
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
Re: deploySite task in github workflow failing
EDIT: Hold that.. Just realised it's working without actually hitting the redirect. Hunting for the old config that must be getting hit. Will update when done. Managed to clobber the errant config file and tested it properly. All good. Do I understand you managed to patch the binaries? And all that...
- Tue May 06, 2025 10:42 am
- Forum: Expansion Pack
- Topic: Things I Wish I Knew BEFORE Starting this *@*#~&ing .oxp
- Replies: 55
- Views: 134911
Re: Things I Wish I Knew BEFORE Starting this *@*#~&ing .oxp
Scenario.plist Savefiles for new game starts I'm stuck. I started my Galactic_start.oxp using a "neutral" save file titled "Jameson - Full game - unhacked". (The strict game Jameson would only load up a strict game). I created another 15 based on this with riveting names such as...
- Tue Apr 15, 2025 10:40 pm
- Forum: Expansion Pack
- Topic: (WIP) Anaconda Cruise Liners
- Replies: 68
- Views: 6422
Re: (WIP) Anaconda Cruise Liners
Fred Oolsen?
- Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:21 pm
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
Re: deploySite task in github workflow failing
I've just used a hacky little python redirect and learned three things. This all works fine on the Mac version. Putting a slash at the end of the URL in the oolite binary doesn't hurt anything. Redirecting to the https variant of the site works fine. From that, I am going to assume the ideal extra U...
- Wed Apr 02, 2025 2:49 pm
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
Re: deploySite task in github workflow failing
Would a rebuild of the windows variant be backwards compatible? Could the fix be more easily achieved by re-doing the last step (constructing the installer)? Yes, it is totally possible to rebuild the installer corresponding to the exact github revision used to generate the 1.90 release. I'm inferr...
- Wed Apr 02, 2025 12:36 pm
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
Re: deploySite task in github workflow failing
The windoze version is a self-extracting installer, and may prove a tad harder to edit. Might be easier to run a re-build for that, unless anyone here knows how to re-jig such a file? I don't think you can jig an NSIS installer. It uses CRCs for self-verifying its integrity when it runs. Even a one...
- Wed Apr 02, 2025 11:42 am
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
Re: deploySite task in github workflow failing
Could you use a URL shortening service (like Tiny URL) to shorten it? That way, nothing else needs to be created. Rather than adding yet another dependency I'd involve timer to test whether https://oolite.space/ is feasible. The string oxz-index-url is looked up in the configuration (GnuStepDefault...
- Tue Apr 01, 2025 4:50 pm
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
Re: deploySite task in github workflow failing
If the domain oolite.org expires on the 9th May, I might snap it up to catch, log and redirect to oolite.space. It'd not be expensive. Does anyone know who/why is holding it? The WhoIs info points at a French lady. Redirecting old bb links is something only the exalted one can do. It ought not take ...
- Tue Apr 01, 2025 4:27 pm
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
Re: deploySite task in github workflow failing
Could we create a URL that is the same length. Thoughts/progress. https://addons.oolite.space/api/1.0/overview/ exists.. Can/should/could Oolite use https for the expansion manager? Leaving out the last two chars of the URL works, at least for the Mac version. I say works.. obviously the URL is non...
- Tue Apr 01, 2025 3:39 pm
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
- Tue Apr 01, 2025 1:34 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: WE ARE DESTROYING OUR FUTURE!!
- Replies: 63
- Views: 13470
Re: WE ARE DESTROYING OUR FUTURE!!
Bump! Is there really no way to update the URL for the Expansions Manager in the three 1.90 downloads? It is over two years now since Timer created oolite.org How many borked versions of 1.90 have been downloaded in those two years? How many of those downloads ended up getting abandoned because we ...
- Tue Apr 01, 2025 1:30 pm
- Forum: Testing and Bug reports
- Topic: deploySite task in github workflow failing
- Replies: 23
- Views: 22531
Re: deploySite task in github workflow failing
I'd understood that it was GitHub which made it impossible to simply update the broken url in the Oolite v.1.90 Expansions Manager Not impossible, but far from simple. I suppose it'd be easiest as a one-off, to build at home, then manually re-upload them. I'll have a crack at doing that for at leas...
- Sun Mar 30, 2025 2:36 pm
- Forum: Expansion Pack
- Topic: Yet another contribution to the collection of HUD´s
- Replies: 64
- Views: 41004
Re: Yet another contribution to the collection of HUD´s
Fantastic work C.B.
Almost self-documenting. That deserves a wiki page (DIY HUD), surely?
Almost self-documenting. That deserves a wiki page (DIY HUD), surely?