Oolite Bulletins

Ahruman wrote:

... I’m not sure which Debian package you’re referring to, but...

I meant the oolite-blah.deb package that would be created by the debian build scripts supplied in the SVN trunk (if it built under Etch).

I found the file where the missing symbol (JSVERSION_1_7) would be, /usr/include/mozjs/jspubtd.h, and the #define statements only went up to JSVERSION_1_6. So I guess the version supplied with Etch (a.k.a. Debian 4.0) is too old and I should get the scripts used to build the packages to build a copy...

Ahruman wrote:

jynx wrote:

So it looks like the JS stuff in the trunk (could you give a path?)

deps/Cross-platform-deps/js

Thanks.

Ahruman wrote:

jynx wrote:

is not a full version or is not used for the Debian package.

Well, no, it wouldn’t be.

Sorry, wouldn't be what?

Sorry, more information required. If the headers are there, why would the program build without them? Is there some kind of configuration mechanism run to determine what is compiled in? How do I influence it if so? Presumably it’s getting the headers from somewhere else, such as headers installed o...

libmozjs-dev in Etch is version 1.8.0.13-pre070702 Is this not backwards compatible with 1.7? The symbol causing the problem is related to the JavaScript language version, not the SpiderMonkey library version. OIC. So the relevant files in libmozjs-dev are not being used by the compilation at all? ...

It told me I needed gnustep-core-devel and libmozjs-dev, so I ran aptitude install gnustep-core-devel libmozjs-dev Started to compile (with a few warnings), but then I got Compiling file src/Core/Scripting/OOScript.m ... Compiling file src/Core/Scripting/OOJSScript.m ... src/Core/Scripting/OOJSScrip...

That'll (in theory) install all the required tools (for 1.65-- have they changed for 1.69.1?) I'm on Debian 4.0 (Etch) on AMD64. The distribution version seems to have built OK, though there were some warnings and I haven't tested if it installs, works, etc. I haven't got the trunk to build yet, but...